While effect sizes are unstable due to sample size, direction consistency supports the hypothesis that optimising prompt formulation front-end is a critical lever for human-AI collaboration.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are integral to complex intellectual tasks, yet output quality remains constrained by user-provided prompts. Iterative multi-turn prompting often leads to context degradation and diminishing cognitive returns. We present PAWNI (Prompt Architecture Wizard using Neural Intelligence), an agentic conversational interface of eight agents that transforms unstructured queries into structured prompts through guided question-and-answer dialogue informed by a self-evolving knowledge base. Rather than optimising the model's response, PAWNI optimises the question itself by front-loading intent clarification. We also propose a three-tier framework of 18 prompt elements across Essential, Enhancement, and Elevation categories. To evaluate system behaviour and validate a measurement protocol, we conducted an exploratory within-subjects study (N=4) across four complex tasks, integrating 32-channel EEG, NASA-TLX workload, and behavioural metrics. Participants produced more structurally complete prompts with PAWNI (42% to 91% of assessed elements), rated LLM outputs higher across all quality dimensions, and reported lower workload (39.6 vs. 21.7 NASA-TLX). Every participant reached satisfactory output in a single turn, compared to 1-12 turns unaided. While effect sizes are unstable due to sample size, direction consistency supports the hypothesis that optimising prompt formulation front-end is a critical lever for human-AI collaboration.
This study directly test whether that omitted within-conversation context changes answers in a conversation and concerns preceding turns in the same conversation and does not test persistent memory across separate conversations.
AnthroDial is presented, a closed-loop framework that formulates anthropomorphic dialogue as a joint problem of system architecture, executable evaluation, and diagnostic alignment and shows that anthropomorphic dialogue benefits when generation, evaluation, and reward shaping share the same behavioral dimensions.
Wentao Liu, Si-Yu Song, Xi Chen et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
GSC-QA (Goal-based Sequential Conversation QA), a framework that integrates three complementary components into a unified enterprise dialogue architecture that combines retrieval, instruction enforcement, and goal persistence in a single coordinated loop built on LangGraph, is introduced.
EYT-Bench is introduced, a human-centered benchmark whose evaluation protocol is built around a decoupled three-party design: a persona-grounded user simulator, a target model evaluated on both intent perception and response generation, and an independent, configurable ensemble of LLM judges.
This study reviews multi-turn conversational AI across text-only dialogue, AudioLLMs and speech-native systems, multimodal and omni-modal systems, and tool-augmented agents, and concludes with a research agenda for systems that can remember, revise, ground, speak, listen, act, and adapt across turns, modalities, and cu...
S. Sara, Zien Sheikh Ali, Hunzalah Hassan Bhatti et al.· 3 citations
A unified taxonomy of 8 categories covering ambiguous and unanswerable questions is addressed, a multi-agent generation pipeline with a two-stage process (NLQ generation followed by SQL grounding) and an explicit Category Conformance validation stage are addressed.
Giovanni Sullutrone, Luca Sala, Sania Aftar et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.