Skip to content

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Intrinsic Motivation for Cooperative Navigation

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics

Abstract

This paper investigates the challenges of achieving robust cooperative navigation in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) scenarios, addressing the limitations of relying solely on extrinsic rewards. We propose a novel framework integrating intrinsic motivation – specifically, curiosity and surprise – into each agent's reward function. Our core claim is that extrinsic rewards alone frequently fail to foster genuine cooperation, leading to suboptimal collective behavior. By introducing intrinsic motivation, agents are driven to explore and interact with their environment in ways that inherently benefit the overall task, promoting more effective coordination. We define a mathematical framework for this approach, outlining the agent reward function and the interaction dynamics. The key equation representing the agent's reward is: Ri(si, ai, s'i) = Rext(si, ai, s'i) + λ * I(si) where: * Ri(si, ai, s'i) is the reward received by agent *i* at state *si*, taking action *ai* and transitioning to state *s'i*. * Rext(si, ai, s'i) is the extrinsic reward, representing the reward for completing the primary navigation task. * λ is a weighting factor controlling the influence of intrinsic motivation. * I(si) is the intrinsic motivation signal, representing the level of novelty or surprise in the new state *si*. The exploration strategy, driven by the intrinsic motivation signal, is then implemented using a stochastic policy, denoted as πi(ai | si). The overall objective is to minimize the expected discounted sum of rewards: J = Eπ[ Σi=1K Σsi, ai Ri(si, ai, s'i) ] We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through theoretical analysis and simulations, showing that incorporating intrinsic motivation significantly improves cooperative behavior compared to standard extrinsic reward-based MARL methods. Future work will explore different intrinsic motivation mechanisms and their optimal weighting.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.