Skip to content

Long-Term Outcomes of LAAO Versus DOACs in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Aug 2026 · Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 0 citations · 9 references
Medicine

TL;DR

LAAO demonstrated efficacy comparable to DOAC therapy in reducing the risk of MACCE, NACE, and ischemic events, while significantly reducing the risk of non-procedure-related bleeding.

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative strategy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with contraindications to long-term oral anticoagulation therapy. However, evidence comparing the long-term outcomes of LAAO with those of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) remains limited.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases through April 2026. Co-primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; composite of cardiac death, stroke, or systemic embolism) and net adverse clinical events (NACE; composite of MACCE and non-procedure-related bleeding). Secondary endpoints included individual components of co-primary endpoints, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause death, major or clinically significant bleeding (procedure + non-procedure related), and stroke or systemic embolism. The random-effects model was used to generate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs.

Results

Four randomized controlled trials comprising 5890 AF patients and a median follow-up of 3 years were included. There was no significant difference between LAAO and DOAC therapy in the risk of MACCE (RR 1.17; 95%CI 0.96-1.41; I2 = 0%) or NACE (RR 0.89; 95%CI 0.65-1.24; I2 = 85%). Both LAAO and DOAC therapy were similar in risk of cardiac death, stroke, systemic embolism, hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, stroke or systemic embolism, and pericardial effusion. LAAO was associated with a lower risk of non-procedure-related bleeding (RR 0.60; 95%CI 0.47-0.76; I2 = 59%).

Conclusion

LAAO demonstrated efficacy comparable to DOAC therapy in reducing the risk of MACCE, NACE, and ischemic events, while significantly reducing the risk of non-procedure-related bleeding. Our findings support a tailored approach to stroke prevention in AF, wherein LAAO serves as an effective alternative for patients with contraindications to DOAC therapy.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion vs Oral Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a non-pharmacological alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Following the publication of recent CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF trials, an updated synthesis of evidence is warranted to clarif...

Ahmed Nazmy, A. Abouelmagd, Ahmed Sobhy et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion versus oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an alternative to oral anticoagulants (OACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, up-to-date comparisons are lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing p...

M. I. Molaro, Cajetan Reichardt, Fiorenzo Simonetti et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of RCTs Using Reconstructed Individual Patient Data.

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a reasonable alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We conducted an updated meta-analysis of RCTs comparing LAAC vs. OAC in patients with AF. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of all stroke, systemic embolism, or...

Armaan Otaal, Megan Coylewright, Mohamad A. Alkhouli et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Stroke prevention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with atrial fibrillation remains clinically challenging because thromboembolic risk must be balanced against substantial bleeding vulnerability. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has been proposed as a nonpharmacologic alt...

Mustafa Abomohsen, Amr Elboliney, A. Mohamed et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Left atrial appendage closure versus medical therapy in atrial fibrillation: An updated meta-analysis of randomized trials on the trade-off between stroke prevention and bleeding.

BACKGROUND Long-term oral anticoagulation remains the standard of care for patients with atrial fibrillation, despite the non-negligible risk of bleeding. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as an alternative strategy for preventing stroke with inconclusive modern data. AIMS Our aim was to e...

G. Di Pietro, Riccardo Improta, E. Bruno et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Who can benefit from percutaneous left atrial appendage closure? Recent advances.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) confers a substantial risk of stroke. Direct  oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are highly effective for stroke prevention and form the cornerstone of AF management. Nevertheless, many eligible patients do not receive or do not maintain long-term anticoagulation because of bleeding risk, prior hemorr...

P. Osmančík, M. Hozman · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.