Skip to content

Author

Abdul-Daaim Mohammed-Murtala

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Open access Aug 2026

Three-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: An updated meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. Advances in stent design and the use of potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors have reduced thrombotic risk, raising questions about whether prolonged DAPT continues to provide incremental benefit. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling exclusively ACS patients undergoing PCI who were randomized to 3-month versus 12-month DAPT. Coprimary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and clinically relevant bleeding (CRB). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, target-vessel revascularization, and net adverse clinical events (NACE; MACCE + CRB). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to evaluate the conclusiveness of evidence for each coprimary outcome. RESULTS Seven RCTs encompassing 17,515 patients (mean age 63 years; 31% women; 45% STEMI) were included. Abbreviated 3-month DAPT did not differ from 12-month therapy for MACCE (5.6% vs 5.7%; risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79-1.17; I2 = 44%), but significantly reduced CRB (3.0% vs 4.9%; RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.76; I2 = 31%), corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 1.9% and number needed to treat of 52. NACE was lower with abbreviated therapy (7.9% vs 9.7%; RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-1.00). TSA crossed the futility boundary for MACCE and the benefit boundary for CRB, indicating conclusive evidence for bleeding reduction and futility for ischemic benefit. CONCLUSIONS Among ACS patients treated with contemporary DES, 3-month DAPT followed by monotherapy significantly reduces bleeding without increasing ischemic events. TSA confirms the conclusiveness of current evidence, supporting abbreviated DAPT as a safe and effective default strategy in appropriately selected ACS patients. REGISTRATION The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with unique identifier CRD420251143351 and URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/search.

C. Chinnatambi, Abdul Rahaman Ottun, Louise Sakowski et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Long-Term Outcomes of LAAO Versus DOACs in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative strategy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with contraindications to long-term oral anticoagulation therapy. However, evidence comparing the long-term outcomes of LAAO with those of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) remains limited. METHODS A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases through April 2026. Co-primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; composite of cardiac death, stroke, or systemic embolism) and net adverse clinical events (NACE; composite of MACCE and non-procedure-related bleeding). Secondary endpoints included individual components of co-primary endpoints, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause death, major or clinically significant bleeding (procedure + non-procedure related), and stroke or systemic embolism. The random-effects model was used to generate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS Four randomized controlled trials comprising 5890 AF patients and a median follow-up of 3 years were included. There was no significant difference between LAAO and DOAC therapy in the risk of MACCE (RR 1.17; 95%CI 0.96-1.41; I2 = 0%) or NACE (RR 0.89; 95%CI 0.65-1.24; I2 = 85%). Both LAAO and DOAC therapy were similar in risk of cardiac death, stroke, systemic embolism, hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, stroke or systemic embolism, and pericardial effusion. LAAO was associated with a lower risk of non-procedure-related bleeding (RR 0.60; 95%CI 0.47-0.76; I2 = 59%). CONCLUSION LAAO demonstrated efficacy comparable to DOAC therapy in reducing the risk of MACCE, NACE, and ischemic events, while significantly reducing the risk of non-procedure-related bleeding. Our findings support a tailored approach to stroke prevention in AF, wherein LAAO serves as an effective alternative for patients with contraindications to DOAC therapy.

Chidubem Ezenna, Khalid Sawalha, Sammudeen Ibrahim et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.