Back to #generative ai
#generative ai Review Open access

Transforming Engineering Education: A Systematic Review of AI Implementation in Classrooms

Oct 2026 · International journal of technology in education and science · 0 citations

TL;DR

A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2024 concludes that while tools such as generative artificial intelligence, intelligent tutoring systems, virtual and augmented reality, and predictive analytics are increasingly present, their adoption is concentrated in specific areas, particularly problem-solving, simulation, and assessment.

Abstract

The rapid rise of artificial intelligence is reshaping higher education, yet its role in engineering education remains fragmented and unevenly understood. This systematic review synthesized sixty-nine peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2024 to examine how artificial intelligence tools are being integrated into engineering curricula. Guided by a technology–pedagogy–ethics framework, the analysis explored the types of artificial intelligence tools employed, their pedagogical applications, and the ethical concerns associated with their use. The findings indicate that while tools such as generative artificial intelligence, intelligent tutoring systems, virtual and augmented reality, and predictive analytics are increasingly present, their adoption is concentrated in specific areas, particularly problem-solving, simulation, and assessment. By contrast, applications supporting collaborative learning, industry-linked design projects, and ethical training remain limited. Generative artificial intelligence emerged as both the most rapidly adopted and the most ethically contested technology, raising questions about academic integrity and originality. This review contributes by offering a discipline-specific synthesis that highlights the pedagogical opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence in engineering education and calls for more deliberate alignment of technological innovation with educational practice and ethical responsibility.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

The socio-ecological costs of AI: Toward socially responsible and sustainable communication practices

The adoption of generative artificial intelligence among communication practitioners and researchers surged after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, urging practitioners to critically engage in exploring pathways for fostering socially responsible and environmentally sustainable AI practices.

Emma Christensen · 4 citations · ⚡1
#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Toward an AI-integrated nursing curriculum: A Kano model analysis of generative AI competency needs.

Clinical nurses' GenAI learning needs are currently oriented toward practical, application-focused skills, and curriculum development may benefit from a phased approach that prioritizes high-impact practical skills while progressively incorporating foundational, ethical, and advanced competencies.

Yeru Xia, Jingbang Liu, Kaili Wang et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1
#generative ai Sep 2026

Eroding scholarly integrity: Confronting the misuse of generative AI in nursing education.

Nursing education must respond proactively by establishing AI literacy frameworks, revising academic integrity policies, and embedding source verification and citation skills into curricula, as generative AI threatens to erode the scholarly standards essential to both academic rigor and professional nursing practice.

Kechi Iheduru-Anderson · 1 citation

Related blog posts