This work investigated Cas12a’s ability to produce different ends and if they can be used to redistribute editing outcomes, and exploited the differences in cleavage kinetics between matched and mismatched gRNAs to develop reprogrammed gRNAs, i.e. rpgRNAs.
Abstract
Gene knockouts by CRISPR-Cas nucleases rely on targeted DNA cleavage and error-prone DNA repair: end-joining pathways can introduce insertions and deletions that assist in disrupting the coding sequence. However, only a fraction of edits achieves this, and an unfavorable array of repair outcomes typically requires switching to another editing technology. Key factors that influence repair are the types and lengths of DNA ends following cleavage. Here, we investigated Cas12a’s ability to produce different ends and if they can be used to redistribute editing outcomes. We determined the sites and rates of target cleavage by Cas12a in vitro by combining kinetic modeling with nucleotide-resolution assays. Here, we show that trimming – repeated cleavage of an already cut target – occurs about 4x faster than initial cleavage; it also presents alternative DNA end structures for cellular repair. We also introduced specific mismatches to the gRNA: Cas12a maintained fast target cleavage, but changed where the target was cleaved and how quickly it was trimmed, compared to matched gRNA. We exploited the differences in cleavage kinetics between matched and mismatched gRNAs to develop reprogrammed gRNAs, i.e. rpgRNAs. Intentionally-mismatched rpgRNAs retained the high editing efficiency observed with traditional gRNAs. However, they shifted editing between in-frame and out-of-frame outcomes to enhance gene knockout success across genes. Reprogrammed gRNAs offer an efficient way to steer editing toward such preferred outcomes, while retaining the simplicity of gene editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases.
It is established that a positive charge at 921 is required for CRISPR RNA-dependent DNA cleavage (cis cleavage), whereas R918 primarily enhances cleavage efficiency, and the potential of modifying active pocket residues to reduce unwanted DNA cleavage while increasing on-target specificity is highlighted.
Saadi Rostami, A. M. dos Santos, Richard S. Van et al.· Journal of Biological Chemis...· 0 citations
Abstract CRISPR–Cas12a nucleases typically induce double-strand breaks (DSBs) to initiate genome editing. However, reliance on DSBs risks chromosomal rearrangements and unintended insertions or deletions at off-target sites. Therefore, engineering nickase variants that cleave only a single DNA strand might enable preci...
Ricardo Villegas Warren, Satoshi N. Omura, Diana León-Castro et al.· Nucleic Acids Research· 0 citations
A new generation of genome editors derived from mobile genetic elements is emerging to address both issues, particularly from the bacterial transposons and insertion sequences colloquially known as ‘jumping genes’.
Christopher Jin, J. Tree· Microbiology Australia· 1 citation
This work provides the first functional analysis of double-strand break repair in a chelicerate of T. urticae, and demonstrates that Polθ-deficient strains enhance incorporation of repair templates, even when mutations are distant from the cut site.
S. De Rouck, W. Dermauw, T. van Leeuwen· iScience· 0 citations
This chapter provides a practical protocol for base editing by electroporation by electroporation in adherent and suspension stem cells and details essential steps for cell handling and recovery, followed by standard readouts.
Irene Peña-Gutiérrez, Davide Mazzeo, A. Bassons-Bascuñana et al.· Methods in molecular biology· 0 citations
Exploring how generative AI could make machine vision more accessible to businesses. The post GenEye in a Box: Making Machine Vision Something You Can Just Ask For appeared first on GPT-Lab.