Text-driven 3D indoor scene synthesis has witnessed significant progress through Large Language Model (LLM)-based frameworks like ReSpace. However, current paradigms heavily rely on retrieving objects from pre-defined, static 3D asset libraries, which fundamentally constrains the diversity and personalization of generated scenes due to the closed-set nature of existing databases. Conversely, recent breakthroughs in promptable segmentation (SAM 3) and single-image 3D reconstruction (SAM 3D) have empowered the extraction of high-fidelity 3D geometry and texture from in-the-wild images. In this paper, we bridge the gap between text-driven scene layout generation and single-view object reconstruction by proposing OpenAsset. This novel framework converts single images of real-world objects into reusable, canonicalized 3D assets that seamlessly integrate into the scene synthesis workflow. Specifically, given a user concept prompt or target region, OpenAsset leverages SAM3 for precise instance isolation and SAM3D for geometry and texture recovery. To ensure compatibility with structured scene representations (SSR), we introduce an automated canonicalization module that normalizes the scale, orientation, and coordinate systems of the reconstructed meshes. By transforming “wild” visual percepts into standardized assets, OpenAsset effectively expands the controllable vocabulary of indoor scene synthesis beyond curated datasets, offering a practical pathway toward user-sourced open 3D scene generation that supports custom objects outside fixed predefined asset libraries. It is worth noting that the satisfactory performance of OpenAsset critically depends on effective segmentation and reconstruction results, which serve as essential prerequisites for our method.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 14, 2026
The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.
AI may appear weightless, but every model depends on physical infrastructure. To understand responsible AI, we need to look beyond algorithms and consider the entire lifecycle of the hardware behind them. The post Responsible AI Must Consider Its Afterlife appeared first on GPT-Lab.