Open Security Benchmark is presented, a framework that benchmarks agentic AI on security posture management work and surfaces a curated enterprise environment that evaluates posture investigation across two modalities: text-to-SQL over a relational snapshot and each vendor's native API over a served instance of the same environment.
Abstract
Enterprises are moving toward autonomous cyber defense: agentic AI that builds situational awareness of an organization's security state and reasons from it to assessments, decisions, and actions. This rests on a holistic view of the enterprise's security state, the continuous, cross-vendor picture of identities, cloud and infrastructure, data, applications, and their configurations that security posture management assembles. As agents take on this work, what matters is not whether an agent can produce an answer but whether it should be trusted to. The field cannot yet answer this question. Real enterprise environments are private, cross-vendor, and deeply correlated, and none is exposed publicly as a shared, queryable target for evaluating such agents end to end. We call this the environment data gap. We present Open Security Benchmark (OSB), a framework that benchmarks agentic AI on this work. OSB surfaces a curated enterprise environment - a frozen, holistic view of the security state - and evaluates posture investigation across two modalities: text-to-SQL over a relational snapshot and each vendor's native API over a served instance of the same environment. Freezing the environment pins the target state as an immutable snapshot and anchors answers to a closed-form ground truth. OSB is built from five components: a data layer, a task and evaluation-set layer, a multi-dimensional scoring layer, a minimal auditable harness, and a bring-your-own path that serves public comparison and private tenant evaluation from one substrate. We instantiate the framework with two identity-security packs and a family of synthetic-organization environment datasets spanning multiple scales, and chart its extension to further posture subdomains, investigation modalities, and defense stages from assessment toward remediation.
Cyber-capable AI agents combine language models with tools, memory, and execution environments to perform multi-step offensive-security tasks. Existing work separately measures cyber capability and catalogs attacks against agent components, but provides less guidance on containing a capable agent within the environment...
This work operationalizes contextual security through four properties that must hold jointly and be evaluated continuously across the agent's trajectory, which changes which defenses are coherent, which evaluations measure something useful, and which attack patterns evaluation can see at all.
Vincent Siu, Jingxuan He, Kyle Montgomery et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
This paper synthesizes the findings of the five-paper AI Agent Security Series into a unified, formal, and falsifiable theory of autonomous agent security, and establishes three meta-theorems: the Component Insufficiency Theorem, the Dynamic Necessity Theorem, and the Interaction Irreducibility Theorem.
Harsh Verma· International Journal of Sci...· 1 citation
It is shown that the more consequential risks lie one layer down, in the protocol between agents and commerce services, and a platform-agnostic defense that drives the structural attack-success rate to zero for four of the five structural classes.
A four-plane theoretical model can be introduced to separate authentication, authorization reasoning, enforcement, and auditability into four closely coupled but independent evolving planes for the system, providing a unified point of reference for both researchers and practitioners in the field of secure and scalable...
Ravi Kumar Kotapati· International Research Journ...· 0 citations
SRE-Bench is introduced, the first realistic, contamination-free RE benchmark, and results indicate that strong source-code security capabilities do not yet transfer to binary analysis, highlighting RE as an important frontier for agentic cybersecurity and SRE-Bench as a rigorous testbed to measure progress.
J. Spence, Nicholas Assaderaghi, Feng Xiao et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.