Skip to content

Global Index on Responsible AI 2026 : Conceptual Framework and Methodology

Jul 2026 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

This edition refines the 1st Edition by strengthening the distinction between framework existence and implementation, restructuring dimensions from three to five thematic areas, introducing more granular variables for framework quality, and applying a multi-stage review and validation process.

Abstract

This report presents the methodology of the Global Index on Responsible AI (GIRAI), 2nd Edition. This edition refines the 1st Edition by strengthening the distinction between framework existence and implementation, restructuring dimensions from three to five thematic areas, introducing more granular variables for framework quality, and applying a multi-stage review and validation process. An independent statistical pre-audit was conducted to assess the coherence and robustness of the framework. GIRAI assesses responsible AI governance across five dimensions: Inclusion and Diversity, Ethics and Sustainability, Labour and Skills, Trust and Safety, and Use of AI in Public Service. Each dimension has a number of indicators (38 in total), organised into three pillars, namely AI Policy (17 indicators on government frameworks and implementation, assessed through primary data), CSO Engagement (5 indicators, primary data), and Enabling Conditions (15 indicators on the structural factors shaping responsible AI governance, assessed through secondary data), and a government Use of Unacceptable Risk AI (URAI) indicator (primary data), applied separately as an accountability penalty to the final score. Data was collected by 135 country-level researchers through a structured global survey, complemented by secondary datasets. The count, scope, enforceability, thematic coverage, and implementation levels of the data points are coded into numerical variables, normalised to a scale of 100, aggregated through pillar weights of 60% (AI policy), 10% (CSO Engagement), and 30% (Enabling conditions). A deduction penalty is applied for countries with evidence of URAI. This documentation enables systematic cross-national comparison, supporting policymakers, civil society, and AI developers to identify where commitments are translating into enforceable protections and where critical gaps remain.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Global Index on Responsible AI: 2026 Report

Findings show that responsible AI governance must move beyond framework adoption toward enforceable rights-based protections, resourced oversight institutions, and accessible redress, and that while responsible AI governance is expanding, this does not often translate into meaningful protection.

Rachel Adams, F. Adeleke, Ayantola Alayande et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Measuring Governance or Wealth? Construct Validation of AI Readiness Indices

Many are the promises of artificial intelligence and the indices claiming to measure government readiness for it. This study provides the first construct validity investigation of the Oxford Insights Government AI Readiness Index, the Tortoise Global AI Index, and the IMF AI Preparedness Index, using a nine‐test batt...

A. B. Brik · 1 citation
Review Aug 2026

Organisational diagnosis of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and designing a desirable model for solutions

This study aims to investigate the organisational factors that constrain the effectiveness of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and proposes a reform-oriented institutional model to strengthen implementation capacity, intergovernmental coordination and overall organisational performance while preserving t...

M. Farhadi, Mojtaba Abbasi Ghadi · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

DEVELOPMENT OF SHARED GOVERNANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 70

This study developed a Shared Governance Model in the context of the strategic implementation of Executive Order No. 70 (EO 70), which institutionalized the Whole-of-Nation Approach to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (ELCAC) in the Philippines. The research examined the current realities and challenges of governance...

Rodolfo M. Pulido, Rommel V. Recla · 0 citations
Open access 2026

A Governance Framework for Responsible AI Integration in Higher Education: A Fuzzy Delphi Study

It is suggested that sustainable AI adoption requires institutions to first establish robust governance structures, ensure data readiness and embed ethical safeguards before expanding technological investments, with particular relevance for resource-constrained higher education contexts in Malaysia and the broader Glob...

Nurul Aisyah Kamrozzaman, N. Muhiddin, Washima Che Dan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Assessing Impact Evaluation Methods: A Comparative Analysis and Proposal for an Integrated and Transformative Framework

The growing complexity of public policies and socio-ecological transitions demands evaluation tools that integrate environmental, economic, and social dimensions across multiple governance contexts. However, the main evaluation impact methods are fragmented and sector-specific, limiting their ability to capture cross-s...

Valentina Cattivelli, Noemi Biancone, F. Ferri et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.