This work introduces a framework that addresses both verification levels in the Lean theorem prover, and can be used to prove formulation-level properties, such as equivalence, equisatisfiability, and the correctness of symmetry-breaking constraints, parametrically for entire problem families.
Abstract
Constraint programming is a core technology for solving complex combinatorial problems in scheduling, planning, configuration, and verification. Trusting its results therefore demands guarantees at two levels: that reformulations applied beforehand are semantics-preserving, and that solvers produce correct answers. In this work, we introduce a framework that addresses both verification levels in the Lean theorem prover: it can be used to prove formulation-level properties, such as equivalence, equisatisfiability, and the correctness of symmetry-breaking constraints, parametrically for entire problem families; and to check solver-produced certificates for individual instances via translation backends to external formats such as MiniZinc, SMT-LIB, and OPB. Combining both levels yields an end-to-end workflow that establishes the satisfiability or unsatisfiability of a constraint problem without trusting the external solver. Experimental results show that our framework's verified symmetry breaking also pays off in practice: a single parametric proof per problem family, reused across all instance sizes, reduces solver search effort by a factor of up to 2x10^7, while the entire in-Lean certification stays affordable, taking at most a few minutes for our largest instances.
This work presents a formal definition of DRCP, a proof system for CP over integer domains that captures core solver operations, including conflict analysis and heterogeneous propagation, by modular inference rules with precise semantics and develops FznDrcpCheck, a formally verified proof checker in Rocq that validate...
Maarten Flippo, K. Sidorov, Tip ten Brink et al.· International Conference on...· 1 citation
FLEX is presented, a foundational Constrained Horn Clause (CHC) solver implemented in LEAN, that reduces the trusted base to the kernel alone, and allows using LEAN's entire proof ecosystem to verify low-level systems code, via three contributions.
J. Khan, Petros Markopoulos, Nicolás Lehmann et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This work develops FLARE (Formulation-Level Automated Reformulation Evaluation), a method that uses an LLM-based agent and the Lean proof assistant to verify proposed reformulations against a reference formulation to enable reliable verification in automated optimization modeling.
Henry W Robbins, Connor Lawless, Madeleine Udell et al.· 1 citation
PalRUP is introduced – an LRUP -based proof format and a bottleneck-free, decentralized parallel checking procedure that only uses the (parallel) file system and is composed of a set of small, sequential trusted components.
Ruben Götz, Michael Dörr, Dominik Schreiber· International Conference on...· 0 citations
This work presents a pipeline that combines LLM-based constraint generation with empirical evaluation and formal verification, and handles MiniZinc’s partial semantics by requiring the base model to be safe and separately proving that the proposed constraint is well-defined for all instances and solutions of the base m...
Philipp Danzinger, Nysret Musliu· International Conference on...· 0 citations
A theoretical analysis of the conditions under which LBBD, including cuts, can preserve optimality in the context of Answer Set Programming (ASP), a prominent logic-based language in the field of Artificial Intelligence and introduces a general-purpose algorithm that preserves the optimality guarantees of Bender Decomp...
Carmine Dodaro, Antonio Ielo, M. Maratea et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.