This work develops FLARE (Formulation-Level Automated Reformulation Evaluation), a method that uses an LLM-based agent and the Lean proof assistant to verify proposed reformulations against a reference formulation to enable reliable verification in automated optimization modeling.
Abstract
Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) is a fundamental tool for combinatorial optimization with extensive real-world applications. A central challenge is designing computationally efficient MILP formulations. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new opportunities to automate the modeling process, from deriving formulations to strengthening them. Reliable automation requires robust methods for verifying that proposed formulations preserve the underlying optimization problem. However, existing approaches evaluate formulations numerically and fail to reason about general problem instances. We resolve this limitation by introducing a constructive definition of MILP reformulation that can be formalized in Lean and machine-checked. We develop FLARE (Formulation-Level Automated Reformulation Evaluation), a method that uses an LLM-based agent and the Lean proof assistant to verify proposed reformulations against a reference formulation. To evaluate our approach, we introduce FormulationBench, a challenging dataset of 20 problems and 109 formulations. FLARE outperforms existing methods, with 100% accuracy on the NP-hard subset of FormulationBench. Furthermore, FLARE produces a machine-checkable certificate for every reformulation it accepts. For cases where formal guarantees are not necessary, we introduce FLARE-NL, a fast and cheap LLM proxy that matches FLARE's accuracy but produces no certificate. These methods enable reliable verification in automated optimization modeling.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable promise in translating and reformulating complex mathematical optimization problems across modeling languages. However, validating such transformations through empirical solver executions alone is unreliable, as solver outcomes may be affected by local minima, structural timeouts, numerical artifacts, and subtle semantic divergence between formulations. We introduce SOVER, an LLM-assisted SMT framework that separates semantic mapping from formal certification: Z3 checks domain cross-feasibility and global objective-order preservation for mixed-integer linear formulations, while dReal provides tolerance-aware feasibility/range and $\epsilon$-argmin checks for continuous nonlinear formulations. We also introduce NLEquiv-150, a public benchmark of 100 equivalent and 50 deliberately hard non-equivalent nonlinear reformulation pairs. With LLM-extracted mappings, SOVER classifies 149/150 pairs (99.33%) correctly, including all 50 hard negatives; the sole error is an incomplete mapping extraction.
This work presents a pipeline that combines LLM-based constraint generation with empirical evaluation and formal verification, and handles MiniZinc’s partial semantics by requiring the base model to be safe and separately proving that the proposed constraint is well-defined for all instances and solutions of the base model.
Philipp Danzinger, Nysret Musliu· International Conference on...· 0 citations
This work introduces a framework that addresses both verification levels in the Lean theorem prover, and can be used to prove formulation-level properties, such as equivalence, equisatisfiability, and the correctness of symmetry-breaking constraints, parametrically for entire problem families.
Pablo Manrique, Stefan Szeider· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Combinatorial problems appear in numerous industrial applications. A common approach is to formulate these problems as declarative constraint models that can subsequently be compiled to and solved by a range of back-end solvers. Recent work shows that Large Language Models (LLMs) can produce correct models from natural language, but even a correct model can be expensive to solve because performance remains sensitive to modelling choices. In this work, we investigate whether LLMs can automate performance-oriented model reformulation. Inspired by Automatic Heuristic Design (AHD), we use an evolutionary framework in which an LLM proposes candidate reformulations that are verified and benchmarked against the user-defined baseline model. We compare AHD-adapted search strategies that control which prior attempts, instructions, and measured feedback enter each prompt. Existing retention strategies prioritize recency or performance, but do not explicitly diversify the context. To cover this gap, we introduce Profile-Diverse Retention (PDR), which applies Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) to instance-level runtime vectors to retain behaviourally diverse attempts. We systematically evaluate the strategies on eight CSPLib problems using validation-based final model selection. The results show that: (i) iterative reformulation can produce substantial held-out speedups; (ii) strategies that keep the retained context diverse outperform those that retain only recent or the fastest attempts; and (iii) validation-based selection improves the held-out speedup of every strategy.
A solver-informed diagnosis mechanism that exploits fine-grained solver statistics as verbal gradients for targeted refinement and a structured memory abstracts prior experience into reusable modeling strategies, avoiding redundant exploration while enabling zero-shot transfer to unseen problems and bootstrapping smaller LLMs.
Haofeng Yuan, Ji-Ming Peng, Jieyi Bi et al.· 0 citations
Machine learning methods have shown that data-driven policies can accelerate mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) solvers, but many such approaches remain difficult to inspect, adapt, and deploy because the learned policy is represented as an external predictor or other opaque model. By contrast, explicit solver logic is easier to understand and integrate, but is usually hand-designed rather than learned from solver feedback. We study whether the automatic design of MILP solver logic can instead be cast as LLM-guided closed-loop search over executable white-box components evaluated directly by end-to-end solver behavior. To this end, we propose a closed-loop program evolution framework for MILP solver auto-design, implemented through PySCIPOpt, and instantiate it on the joint design of a cut selector and a branching rule. Candidate programs are iteratively generated, loaded into SCIP, and evaluated by direct execution on MILP instances, with the resulting feedback guiding performance-based selection, targeted repair, diagnostic reflection, and diversity-aware population maintenance. The method outputs explicit solver components that can be inspected, modified, and deployed within standard solver workflows. Across four benchmark families, we find that LLM-guided program evolution can discover competitive domain-specialized policies in several settings.
Jinbiao Nie, Kewei Feng, Xiaoyuan Zhang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
