Skip to content

Robust Risk Under Evolving Uncertainty: A Wasserstein Counterpart of the Entropic Value-at-Risk

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 29 references
Computer Science Mathematics

Abstract

An agent still learning its environment should be cautious while ignorant and bold once confident. The entropic value-at-risk captures this through a robust-optimization identity---a confidence level fixes the radius of a relative-entropy ball of alternative models---but that ball cannot reach catastrophes the nominal deems impossible, precisely what a safe agent must hedge. We instead use an optimal-transport ball and study the coherent risk measure it induces, the Wasserstein entropic value-at-risk. It has a variational dual mirroring the entropic formula (an inverse temperature becomes a transport price), occupies a definite place in the risk hierarchy, and provably accounts for the reachable catastrophes the entropic measure ignores; we verify both dualities numerically. Driving the transport radius by belief entropy then yields a closed-form robust dynamic-programming operator whose caution contracts as the belief sharpens, with a certified safety sandwich and a sharp safety switch.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Quantifying Risk Under Evolving Uncertainty: Belief-Dependent Robustness for Safe Sequential Decision Making

RATTL targets runtime safety for agents, including LLM-based systems, acting under uncertainty, and proves a Safety Sandwich: the RATTL value lies between the uninformed robust value and the full- knowledge optimum, with a gap that vanishes as the posterior concentrates.

D. Ganguly, Jan Křetinský · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

The Uniqueness of Exponential Second-Order Expected Utility

Exponential Second-Order Expected Utility (SOEU) underlies the entropic approach to model uncertainty. This paper explores in what sense that functional form is essential. In the misspecification-robust Smooth Ambiguity criterion, let a single parameter govern both the model-level robustness and the ambiguity-averse ag...

Yosuke Hashidate · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Equivalence Between Continuous-Time Risk-Sensitive Control and R\'enyi Divergence Minimization

In this study, we show that a continuous-time risk-sensitive control problem is equivalent to a R\'enyi divergence minimization problem over trajectory path measures. Reformulating stochastic optimal control as probabilistic inference via Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence minimization avoids the computational intractabi...

Shinji Kataoka, K. Teranishi, Yasumasa Fujisaki · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Bayesian Confidence Recalibration and Research-Equilibrium Criticality: Temporal Support in Robust Portfolios

Robust portfolio rules that reconstruct confidence sets after learning need not preserve the evaluator obtained by prior-by-prior Bayesian transport. In the Gaussian model, this discrepancy is summarized by natural-coordinate displacement: inherited transport preserves it whereas fresh reconstruction can replace it. We...

Han Yanç · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

The Risk-Sensitive Schr\"odinger Bridge: Is Not a KL Projection

The Schr\"odinger bridge owes its computational power to a single structural fact: by Girsanov's theorem the controlled problem is a Kullback--Leibler (KL) projection onto a fixed reference measure, solvable by alternating projections. This letter shows that the fact does not survive risk sensitivity. When the expected...

Hamidreza Behjoo · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Prediction with Five Experts and Geometric Stopping: A Probabilistic Construction and Analytic Verification

We present a solution of the limiting five-expert prediction problem with geometric stopping, based on stochastic calculus and partial differential equations. If $\delta$ is the stopping probability, the minimax expected regret from tied initial scores is $45\pi^2/(512\sqrt{2\delta})+o(\delta^{-1/2})$ as $\delta\downar...

Erhan Bayraktar, Ibrahim Ekren, N. Kolliopoulos · 3 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.