Skip to content
#software testing Review Open access

Proof of Concept of Large Language Models for Opioid Treatment Policy Surveillance: 97% Agreement With Subject Matter Experts.

Aug 2026 · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

LLMs could serve as a quality control check during opioid policy surveillance research, supplementing human review, and benefit from best practices and technical guidelines for LLM utilization.

Abstract

Objective

Policy surveillance typically involves detailed, time-consuming manual screening of policies for inclusion in a final dataset. This screening process involves risks of human error and inconsistent application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, especially in complicated legal landscapes like the US opioid treatment landscape. Large language models (LLMs) could assist human subject matter experts (SMEs) during screening, but LLMs have been understudied for policy surveillance. Therefore, we conducted a test comparing opioid treatment policy screening decisions between SMEs and an LLM.

Methods

Using a Boolean search string in legal software, we identified 99 potentially relevant Massachusetts policies for emergency department opioid addiction treatment, and we downloaded text from government websites. Next, we compared two approaches to screening those policies using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria: (a) manual screening by three SMEs, and (b) an LLM approach. We assessed the overall percentage of inclusion/exclusion decisions where the LLM made the same decision as the SMEs. We also identified the percentage of policies selected for inclusion by the SMEs with which the LLM agreed and potential reasons for discrepancies.

Results

The LLM made the same decision for 96 of 99 policies (97% of the time). All policies that SMEs chose to include (n=2) were also included by the LLM. Discrepancies reflected implicit inclusion and exclusion criteria used by SMEs but not provided to LLMs.

Conclusion

LLMs could serve as a quality control check during opioid policy surveillance research, supplementing human review. The policy surveillance field would benefit from best practices and technical guidelines for LLM utilization.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Making Broad Evidence Synthesis Feasible: An LLM Screening Agent for Meta-Analyses Applied To Suicide Prevention

To develop and validate ScreenAgent, a large language model (LLM) agent for title and abstract screening, and a review-specific method for prospectively estimating screening performance, which identified nearly all eligible studies with human-level reliability for a fraction of a US cent per record while keeping human...

D. Dobin, A. Witmer, F. Sweeney et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

AI-Powered Prescription Error Detection Using Large Language Models (LLMs): A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives

It is concluded that LLM-based decision-support tools hold substantial promise as complementary — rather than autonomous — decision-support systems capable of transforming medication safety and pharmacy practice.

K. K. Kumar, Koyya Gowtham Reddy, K. Reddy · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Large Language Models in Adverse Drug Reaction Detection and Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

Current evidence supports supervised, task-specific applications of LLMs for extraction, triage, retrieval, and documentation rather than autonomous pharmacovigilance decision-making, highlighting their potential for precision medicine and big data-enabled safety monitoring.

Tae You Kim, Won-Sik Oh, Dong-Hwa Jeong · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Qualitative Analysis of Discrepancy Patterns Between Large Language Models and Human Reviewers in Abstract Screening for Systematic Reviews.

LLM-assisted screening may improve efficiency without compromising reliability when accompanied by appropriate safeguards for ambiguous records, and many model-human disagreements reflect topic- and workflow-dependent screening conventions rather than intrinsic model failure.

K. Lee, Hakyoung Kim, Dae Sik Yang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Confident but unsupported: auditing large language models against supplied evidence boundaries in drug-induced liver injury assessment

These findings identify unsupported reassurance as measurable evidence-boundary behavior in LLM drug-risk assessment and establish a reproducible framework for auditing adherence to an externally supplied evidence boundary, defined by PubMed evidence classification and enforced by prompt policy rather than inferred ind...

Jinwan Shi, Yong Ma, Yinhui Liu et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access 2026

A Policy-guided LLM Pipeline for Safer Clinical Decision Support: Error Analysis on High-risk Medication Queries

This paper presents a policy-guided LLM pipeline for medication-related clinical decision support, designed to classify prompts into safety-oriented decision categories: ACCEPT, WARN, DEFER, ESCALATE, or REFUSE, to handle prompts involving dosage, pregnancy, drug interactions, self-adjustment, and other safety-critical...

Ana Stevanović, Mlađan Jovanović · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.