Aug 2026· Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
LLMs could serve as a quality control check during opioid policy surveillance research, supplementing human review, and benefit from best practices and technical guidelines for LLM utilization.
Abstract
Objective
Policy surveillance typically involves detailed, time-consuming manual screening of policies for inclusion in a final dataset. This screening process involves risks of human error and inconsistent application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, especially in complicated legal landscapes like the US opioid treatment landscape. Large language models (LLMs) could assist human subject matter experts (SMEs) during screening, but LLMs have been understudied for policy surveillance. Therefore, we conducted a test comparing opioid treatment policy screening decisions between SMEs and an LLM.
Methods
Using a Boolean search string in legal software, we identified 99 potentially relevant Massachusetts policies for emergency department opioid addiction treatment, and we downloaded text from government websites. Next, we compared two approaches to screening those policies using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria: (a) manual screening by three SMEs, and (b) an LLM approach. We assessed the overall percentage of inclusion/exclusion decisions where the LLM made the same decision as the SMEs. We also identified the percentage of policies selected for inclusion by the SMEs with which the LLM agreed and potential reasons for discrepancies.
Results
The LLM made the same decision for 96 of 99 policies (97% of the time). All policies that SMEs chose to include (n=2) were also included by the LLM. Discrepancies reflected implicit inclusion and exclusion criteria used by SMEs but not provided to LLMs.
Conclusion
LLMs could serve as a quality control check during opioid policy surveillance research, supplementing human review. The policy surveillance field would benefit from best practices and technical guidelines for LLM utilization.
To develop and validate ScreenAgent, a large language model (LLM) agent for title and abstract screening, and a review-specific method for prospectively estimating screening performance, which identified nearly all eligible studies with human-level reliability for a fraction of a US cent per record while keeping human...
D. Dobin, A. Witmer, F. Sweeney et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
It is concluded that LLM-based decision-support tools hold substantial promise as complementary — rather than autonomous — decision-support systems capable of transforming medication safety and pharmacy practice.
K. K. Kumar, Koyya Gowtham Reddy, K. Reddy· International Scientific Jou...· 0 citations
Current evidence supports supervised, task-specific applications of LLMs for extraction, triage, retrieval, and documentation rather than autonomous pharmacovigilance decision-making, highlighting their potential for precision medicine and big data-enabled safety monitoring.
Tae You Kim, Won-Sik Oh, Dong-Hwa Jeong· Diagnostics· 0 citations
LLM-assisted screening may improve efficiency without compromising reliability when accompanied by appropriate safeguards for ambiguous records, and many model-human disagreements reflect topic- and workflow-dependent screening conventions rather than intrinsic model failure.
K. Lee, Hakyoung Kim, Dae Sik Yang et al.· Journal of Epidemiology· 0 citations
These findings identify unsupported reassurance as measurable evidence-boundary behavior in LLM drug-risk assessment and establish a reproducible framework for auditing adherence to an externally supplied evidence boundary, defined by PubMed evidence classification and enforced by prompt policy rather than inferred ind...
Jinwan Shi, Yong Ma, Yinhui Liu et al.· Frontiers in Public Health· 0 citations
This paper presents a policy-guided LLM pipeline for medication-related clinical decision support, designed to classify prompts into safety-oriented decision categories: ACCEPT, WARN, DEFER, ESCALATE, or REFUSE, to handle prompts involving dosage, pregnancy, drug interactions, self-adjustment, and other safety-critical...
Ana Stevanović, Mlađan Jovanović· SINTEZA· 0 citations
Related blog posts
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 12, 2026
StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026
Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 2, 2026
Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.