2026· International Conference on Software and Data Technologies· pp. 270-277· 0 citations· 24 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
The proposed model aims to support the formalization of model selection processes, improve decision-making, and enhance the traceability and transparency of LLMOps practices and forms part of a broader research effort toward the formalization of the entire LLMOps life cycle.
Abstract
: The efficient adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in enterprises requires formalizing and systematically implementing LLM Operations (LLMOps), as it could reduce costs and ensure the reproducibility of LLM solutions. One of the critical phases of LLMOps is selecting a suitable LLM, as it can significantly affect a system’s performance, feasibility, and maintainability during the operational phase. As a result, uninformed decisions about model selection that do not align with business, functional, and non-functional requirements may severely impact subsequent stages of the LLMOps life cycle. To investigate the model selection phase, we conducted an extensive Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and synthesized its findings to derive a set of activities fundamental to this phase. These activities are presented in an end-to-end UML activity diagram. The proposed model aims to support the formalization of model selection processes, improve decision-making, and enhance the traceability and transparency of LLMOps practices. This work forms part of a broader research effort toward the formalization of the entire LLMOps life cycle, with the goal of facilitating scalable and reliable integration of LLMs in enterprise environments.
This paper investigates the reliability of LLMs in evaluating UML diagrams generated through reverse engineering processes (source code) and asks: do LLM assessments align with those of human experts?
Olena Chebanyuk, Carles Sierra· International Conference on...· 0 citations
The use of large language models (LLMs) to support non-modeling experts of multi-perspective EM are investigated and LLMs can be seen as assistive technology for certain tasks in EM.
Peter-Alexander Kolev, Hauke Hansen Pruss, J. Wilken et al.· Journal of Software and Syst...· 0 citations
The results show that the applied LLM can reliably detect structural and semantic differences between formal business process models using Business Process Model and Notation, while distinguishing them from acceptable variations, demonstrating strong potential for automated model validation.
Christian Bennoit, S. Zamani, Tobias Greff· Process Science· 0 citations
EffABPMN2MV represents a theoretically grounded and empirically validated contribution to BPM, collaborative software design, and blockchain-enabled information systems.
Masoud Rezaei, Abbas Mirzaei, Babak Nouri-Moghaddam et al.· Journal of Resource Manageme...· 0 citations
Interviews with sixteen early-adopter software professionals who integrated LLM-based tools into their day-to-day work in early to mid-2023 offer actionable implications for developers, organizations, educators, and tool designers seeking to integrate LLMs responsibly into professional software practice.
Benyamin T. Tabarsi, Heidi Reichert, Sam Gilson et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 22 citations· ⚡1
Current approaches show strong potential, but they still act more as intelligent assistants than as fully autonomous process modelers, including the continued need for human involvement and the output quality.