Aug 2026· 1 citation· ⚡ 1 influential· 20 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This analysis reveals a scale-sensitive interaction between the statistical estimation of classification error and its amplification by robustness, sharply explaining the transition in the agnostic rate.
Abstract
We study distributionally robust PAC learning for the $0$--$1$-loss, where adversarial perturbations of the data distribution are constrained by a Cressie--Read divergence of order $k>1$ and radius $\rho\geq 0$. For hypothesis classes with VC dimension $d$, we establish realizable and agnostic sample-complexity bounds tight up to constant and logarithmic factors, respectively; ordinary empirical risk minimization attains both rates up to logarithmic factors. For target accuracy $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$ and confidence $\delta\in(0,1)$, their respective orders are \[ \max\!\left\{\frac{1}{\varepsilon}, \frac{\rho^{\frac 1{k-1}}}{\varepsilon^{k_\star}} \right\}\cdot(d+\log \delta^{-1}) \qquad\text{and}\qquad \max\!\left\{\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}, \frac{\rho^{\frac1{k-1}}}{\varepsilon^{k_\star\vee 2}} \right\}\cdot(d+\log \delta^{-1}), \] where $k_\star={k}/{(k-1)}$. For every fixed $\rho>0$, robustness changes the realizable $\varepsilon$-dependence from $\varepsilon^{-1}$ to $\varepsilon^{-k_\star}$ as $\varepsilon\downarrow0$. In the agnostic case, for $1<k<2$, robustness changes the $\varepsilon$-dependence from $\varepsilon^{-2}$ to $\varepsilon^{-k_\star}$, whereas for $k\geq2$ the exponent remains the classical $2$, with nontrivial $\rho$-dependence. Building on the known scalar reduction of robust $0$--$1$ risk to ordinary classification error, our analysis reveals a scale-sensitive interaction between the statistical estimation of classification error and its amplification by robustness, sharply explaining the transition in the agnostic rate. We extend the previously studied $\chi^2$-divergence case to every Cressie--Read order $k>1$, close its upper--lower gaps, and recover standard PAC learning rates as $\rho\to0$, unlike previous bounds that fail to interpolate correctly in this limit.
This paper settles the sample complexity of agnostic PAC learning up to universal constants at every fixed $L^*$, matching the lower bounds of Devroye, Gyorfi, and Lugosi.
Markus Engelund Mathiasen, Jian Qian, Nikita Zhivotovskiy· 2 citations· ⚡1
Worst-case multiclass bounds do not become smaller when the best classifier is already nearly correct: what is missing is an optimistic rate, a guarantee whose fluctuation scales with the oracle risk itself. For a class of Natarajan dimension $d_N$ and Daniely-Shalev-Shwartz dimension $d_{DS}$, the optimal excess risk...
Xiao-Yu Li, Andi Han, Jiao-Jiao Jiang et al.· 1 citation
In this paper, we study the sample complexity of the empirical plug-in estimator for the $2$-Gromov-Wasserstein distance $D_2$ between compactly supported probability measures on Euclidean spaces. Let $\mu$ and $\nu$ be supported on compact subsets of $\mathbb{R}^{d_x}$ and $\mathbb{R}^{d_y}$, respectively, and let $\w...
Pui-Kuen Leung, Riku Okada, Samuel Lok-Hei Wong· 0 citations
This work refine the existing parameter estimation guarantees under the fatness assumption, improving the prior sample complexity to $O( \log n / \epsilon^2)$ for $\ell_\infty$-recovery, matching the untruncated minimax rate.
Rohan Chauhan, Ioannis Panageas· arXiv.org· 0 citations
The proofs combine a persistent randomized Balog-Szemer\'edi-Gowers procedure producing a fixed implicit small-doubling subset on the $\sqrt{\alpha}$ retained-mass scale, conditionally exact finite product sampling, size-oblivious algorithmic PFR, and deterministic lifting.
It is proved that VC classes are adversarially robustly learnable with sample complexity linear in the VC dimension $d$, providing an exponential improvement over the previous upper bound of Montasser, Hanneke, and Srebro (2019).
Omar Montasser· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.