A materials property hierarchy is introduced, from intrinsic, composition-determined properties to extrinsic, processing-dependent performance, to clarify deployment constraints and distinguish structural, physical and deployment novelty.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is accelerating materials prediction and design by enabling efficient exploration of chemical and structural spaces, with particular promise for novel materials discovery. However, novelty in materials discovery encompasses chemical plausibility, structural distinctiveness, property relevance and experimental realisability, making AI-driven novelty claims difficult to substantiate. We introduce a materials property hierarchy, from intrinsic, composition-determined properties to extrinsic, processing-dependent performance, to clarify deployment constraints and distinguish structural, physical and deployment novelty. This framework motivates an evidence-based view of multimodal materials data spanning chemical composition, microstructure, processing, and testing and characterisation, showing that current evidence remains concentrated in composition and idealised structure while heterogeneous, under-represented and weakly integrated modalities limit support for physical and deployment novelty. It also highlights the limitations of benchmarks based mainly on computational labels and proxy novelty criteria. Community-wide standards for data collection, modality alignment and evidence synthesis are needed to support multimodal data construction, process-aware multimodal modelling, feasibility-first generative modelling and deployment-aware benchmarking, so that generative and multimodal AI can design experimentally realisable materials with defensible scientific and practical novelty.
This review aims to offer a conceptual framework and a solid reference for building intelligent multimodal material selection systems and presents a forward-looking research agenda covering self-supervised learning, knowledge-enhanced models, and interpretable human–AI collaboration.
Yuwei Zhang, C. Tan, Bei-Chen Wang et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
Generative artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming materials design by enabling de novo exploration of immense chemical spaces. Yet a large proportion of AI-generated compositions remain implausible, violating established chemical principles, which limits the reliability and interpretability of generative mater...
Kinga O. Mastej, Panyalak Detrattanawichai, Hyunsoo Park et al.· 0 citations
This work will present the current work on inverse material design, where AI methods—particularly generative pretrained transformers—are used to predict new material candidates based on desired properties, pushing the boundaries of materials innovation.
I. Gonzales, R. Ullberg, Andrew H Salij et al.· ECS Meeting Abstracts· 0 citations
This review examines emerging AI methodologies for accelerated materials discovery, with particular emphasis on how computational design, data infrastructure, synthesis planning, and autonomous experimentation can be connected into experimentally grounded workflows.
Jaehwan Choi, Seongmin Kim, Junkil Park et al.· Chemical Reviews· 4 citations
A reinforcement learning framework that guides latent denoising diffusion models in finding diverse and novel, yet thermodynamically viable, crystalline compounds and demonstrates enhanced property-guided design that preserves chemical validity while targeting desired functional properties.
Hyunsoo Park, Aron Walsh· Nature Machine Intelligence· 27 citations· ⚡3
This work builds ORDER, a multimodal framework linking microstructures and descriptors with preserved property trends, aiding prediction, retrieval, and microstructure generation and consistently outperforms alignment-oriented and property-aware baselines across property prediction, cross-modal retrieval, and microstru...
Xinyao Li, Hangwei Qian, Jingjing Li et al.· Nature Communications· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.