Generative artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming materials design by enabling de novo exploration of immense chemical spaces. Yet a large proportion of AI-generated compositions remain implausible, violating established chemical principles, which limits the reliability and interpretability of generative materials design. Here, we introduce a chemical validity operator that recasts heuristic chemical rules as a configurable algorithmic prior for evaluating and guiding generative materials discovery. Built on the open-source SMACT package, a data-informed oxidation-state model exposes tunable thresholds, allowing users to interpolate continuously between permissive and conservative chemical constraints, while supporting both exploratory and conservative materials-design workflows. Benchmarking six state-of-the-art generative models for inorganic crystals shows that most reproduce stoichiometry but under-represent realistic oxidation-state combinations, and that filtering removes compositions reliant on rarely observed oxidation states while preserving low-energy compounds near the convex hull. Beyond screening, the same operator can also serve as a reinforcement-learning reward, steering a latent diffusion model towards chemically grounded compositions. By encoding chemical heuristics and observations, this work establishes a foundation for oxidation-state-aware generative models.
A reinforcement learning framework that guides latent denoising diffusion models in finding diverse and novel, yet thermodynamically viable, crystalline compounds and demonstrates enhanced property-guided design that preserves chemical validity while targeting desired functional properties.
Hyunsoo Park, Aron Walsh· Nature Machine Intelligence· 27 citations· ⚡3
A materials property hierarchy is introduced, from intrinsic, composition-determined properties to extrinsic, processing-dependent performance, to clarify deployment constraints and distinguish structural, physical and deployment novelty.
Xianyuan Liu, Charles Anjah, Benjamin E. Jolly et al.· Journal of Physics Materials· 0 citations
Most computationally predicted materials are never synthesized because conventional synthesis optimization is slow, expertise-dependent, and iterative. Here we present a closed-loop framework that automates this expert workflow by placing human tacit knowledge in the loop through a large language model (LLM) that disti...
Fang Sheng, S. Torrisi, Amanda A. Volk et al.· 0 citations
Closed-loop materials discovery iterates between proposing candidate structures and evaluating their properties, and property evaluation dominates the cost. In the generative variant, a learned prior proposes candidate crystals and a property oracle scores them; we ask whether a cheap probabilistic surrogate can triage...
Sk Md Ahnaf Akif Alvi, Jan Janssen, Danny Perez et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
A review of physically constrained, multimodal and closed‐loop workflows as the clearest route from generative crystal models to experimentally actionable candidates and defines the inverse‐design problem and main generation tasks.
Tao Li, Xiaolin Liu, Fei Wang et al.· ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL M...· 0 citations
This review examines emerging AI methodologies for accelerated materials discovery, with particular emphasis on how computational design, data infrastructure, synthesis planning, and autonomous experimentation can be connected into experimentally grounded workflows.
Jaehwan Choi, Seongmin Kim, Junkil Park et al.· Chemical Reviews· 4 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.