Administering vision therapy in conjunction with patching significantly improved VA, stereo acuity, and accommodation facility in bilateral refractive amblyopia compared to patching alone.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the effectivity of vision therapy plus patching versus patching combined with placebo therapy in bilateral refractive amblyopia.Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, children with bilateral refractive amblyopia were enrolled. Monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 0.3 logMAR (20/40) to 0.6 logMAR (20/80) in both eyes, and visual acuity (VA) difference was less than 0.2 logMAR between the eyes. The experimental group received patching plus in-office vision therapy with Vision Therapy System 4 (VTS4), including accommodation, stereopsis, ocular movements, and visual memory skills, while the control group received patching plus in-office placebo therapy. The primary outcome measure was BCVA, and the secondary outcomes were stereo acuity, and accommodative facility measured pre- and post-therapy.Results: Forty children aged 5 to 8 were included. After 4 months of therapy, the mean VA improvement was 0.23 ± 0.08 logMAR [2.3 line] (P < 0.001) in the experimental group and 0.09 ± 0.06 logMAR [0.09 line] (P < 0.001) in the control group. The difference in VA improvement between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Post-therapy, the improvements in Randot stereoacuity and in monocular and binocular accommodative facilities were statistically significant between the experimental and the control groups (P = 0 .013, P = 0.005, P = 0.002, respectively).Conclusion: Administering vision therapy in conjunction with patching significantly improved VA, stereo acuity, and accommodation facility in bilateral refractive amblyopia compared to patching alone.
Active vision therapy leads to significant and accelerates improvements in CS among children with bilateral refractive amblyopia and demonstrates a rate of change in monocular CS of 0.05 during follow-up time.
Saeed Rahmani, Saeedeh Hoseinmenni, C. Dehghani et al.· International Journal of Oph...· 0 citations
Vision therapy can produce clinically meaningful and durable visual improvements in amblyopic patients who no longer respond to occlusion alone, and supports extending amblyopia treatment into adolescence and adulthood, while emphasizing the need for tailored approaches based on the etiology of amblyopia and age.
Hassan Hashemi, Alireza Jamali, E. Jafarzadehpur et al.· Strabismus· 0 citations
Luminopia demonstrated significant improvements in Registry patients with severe amblyopia, particularly in treatment-naive patients, supporting its use as a viable treatment option that may address key limitations of traditional approaches.
Courtney L. Kraus, A. Godfrey, E. Gaier et al.· Journal of AAPOS· 1 citation
Use of a dichoptic digital therapeutic device in the treatment and management of amblyopia holds exciting potential in deprivation amblyopia, although a percentage of patients with severe amblyopia did show modest improvement.
W. Sambhariya, Courtney L. Kraus· Journal of pediatric ophthal...· 0 citations
Overall, CureSight was noninferior to patching in these amblyopia types and yielded better visual outcomes in children completing ≥ 60% dosage, supporting binocular therapy as an additional first-line option.
O. Yehezkel, T. Wygnanski-Jaffe, B. Kushner et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
The effect of full cycloplegic spectacle correction on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), interocular difference in BCVA, and the presence of stereopsis in children previously treated for ametropic amblyopia in children previously diagnosed and treated for amblyopia is evaluated.
Matej Gajdoš, Zuzana Tóthová, Karolína Benca-Kapitánová et al.· Czech and Slovak Ophthalmolo...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.