Aug 2026· International Journal of Ophthalmology· Vol 19 8, pp.
1550-1555
· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
Active vision therapy leads to significant and accelerates improvements in CS among children with bilateral refractive amblyopia and demonstrates a rate of change in monocular CS of 0.05 during follow-up time.
Abstract
Aim
To evaluate the effectiveness of combining patching with active vision therapy, compared to patching with placebo training on contrast sensitivity (CS) in pediatric participants with bilateral refractive amblyopia.
Methods
In this double-blind, clinical trial, 43 participants aged 5-8 with bilateral refractive amblyopia, unresponsive to spectacles, were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (active vision therapy plus patching) or the control group (placebo treatment with patching) for four months. Active therapy included anti-suppression, accommodative, vergence, and visual memory exercises. CS was measured at baseline and after four months, serving as key outcome measures.
Results
Forty participants (20 in each group) completed the study. The mean age for the experimental group (5 males) was 6.10±0.84y, and 6.50±1.15y for the control group (11 males). CS in the experimental group improved by 0.10 log (right eye), 0.14 log (left eye), and 0.07 log binocularly (P≤0.03). The control group showed no statistically significant enhancements in monocular or binocular CS (P≥0.07). Compared to the control group, the experimental group demonstrated a rate of change in monocular CS of 0.05 during follow-up time.
Conclusion
Active vision therapy leads to significant and accelerates improvements in CS among children with bilateral refractive amblyopia.
Administering vision therapy in conjunction with patching significantly improved VA, stereo acuity, and accommodation facility in bilateral refractive amblyopia compared to patching alone.
Saeedeh Hoseinmenni, S. Rahmani, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour et al.· Journal of Ophthalmic & Visi...· 0 citations
Vision therapy can produce clinically meaningful and durable visual improvements in amblyopic patients who no longer respond to occlusion alone, and supports extending amblyopia treatment into adolescence and adulthood, while emphasizing the need for tailored approaches based on the etiology of amblyopia and age.
Hassan Hashemi, Alireza Jamali, E. Jafarzadehpur et al.· Strabismus· 0 citations
Luminopia demonstrated significant improvements in Registry patients with severe amblyopia, particularly in treatment-naive patients, supporting its use as a viable treatment option that may address key limitations of traditional approaches.
Courtney L. Kraus, A. Godfrey, E. Gaier et al.· Journal of AAPOS· 1 citation
Overall, CureSight was noninferior to patching in these amblyopia types and yielded better visual outcomes in children completing ≥ 60% dosage, supporting binocular therapy as an additional first-line option.
O. Yehezkel, T. Wygnanski-Jaffe, B. Kushner et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
AVT with occlusion was associated with greater improvements in functional visuomotor task performance and visual outcomes in children with anisometropic amblyopia, supporting its role as a function-oriented adjunct to conventional therapy.
Manisha Koirala, Sanjeev Bhattarai, J. Shrestha et al.· Journal of Optometry· 0 citations
Use of a dichoptic digital therapeutic device in the treatment and management of amblyopia holds exciting potential in deprivation amblyopia, although a percentage of patients with severe amblyopia did show modest improvement.
W. Sambhariya, Courtney L. Kraus· Journal of pediatric ophthal...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.