Skip to content
#federated learning Book Open access

Time to Protection in Federated Intrusion Detection on Jetson Orin Nano Clusters

Nov 2026 · 0 citations

TL;DR

The findings show that federation delivers recognition of an attack class quickly when much of the fleet already holds it, and slowly or not within the authors' horizon when only a few devices have been hit, which is the case a defender is most concerned with.

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) allows IoT devices to improve a shared intrusion detector without exchanging raw data. A device, however, can only learn from attacks that reach it, and because federated detection is evaluated as a whole for the fleet of IoT devices or averaged over attack classes, it is not reported how long a device that has never observed an attack class remains exposed to it without protection. The aim of this paper is to measure that exposure window, round by round, and to determine how it depends on the share of the fleet that already holds the class. We deployed a federated system with nine clients on two Jetson Orin Nano clusters connected over a WAN. As the main dataset, we used N-BaIoT, which covers two devices that were never infected by the mirai attack. It was tested with one to seven attacked clients and validated on CWRU and PAMAP2 datasets. The results showed that new class arrival depends on the share of the fleet that already knows about it, reaching 0.827 on mirai after one round when trained from the start with mirai data on seven out of nine clients, and reaching protection thresholds after 4, 17, and 39 rounds for seven, three, and two of nine clients attacked, when the model was initially trained without knowledge of mirai. Our findings show that federation delivers recognition of an attack class quickly when much of the fleet already holds it, and slowly or not within our horizon when only a few devices have been hit, which is the case a defender is most concerned with.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.