Skip to content
#federated learning Book Open access

Strategic Client-Level Defense Placement in Mobile Federated Learning

Nov 2026 · ACM International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks and Mobile Computing (MobiHoc) · 0 citations
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) enables mobile and edge devices to train jointly without centralizing private data, but compromised clients can poison the global model. When client-level protections cover only part of the population, a rational attacker can exploit predictable placement. We introduce SGDP-FL (Stackelberg Game-Based Defense Placement for Federated Learning), a budget-constrained Stackelberg game between a defender and an attacker. Before each round, the defender decides which clients to protect. The attacker observes this placement only through noisy reconnaissance, updates its belief about which clients are protected, and then chooses which clients to attack. We model the noisy observation as a Binary Symmetric Channel, and we model imperfect defenses by letting each protection block an attack only with a fixed probability. Monte Carlo estimation and a greedy knapsack oracle make the resulting bilevel problem tractable. We evaluate SGDP-FL on EMNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100 under IID and non-IID partitions. The evaluation covers single- and multi-client attacks, with attack targets either fixed or periodically reshuffled. In every tested setting, SGDP-FL achieves the highest mean accuracy among Random, Highest-Value, and UCB allocation. Under multi-client attacks with periodic reshuffling, it raises CIFAR-10 IID accuracy from 55.68% for the strongest baseline to 59.78%, and CIFAR-100 IID from 32.42% to 34.49%. It also transfers to label-flipping and backdoor attacks and complements robust aggregation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.