Skip to content
Review

Dental Implant Outcomes in Osteoporotic and Osteopenic Women: A Systematic Review on Premenopausal Care

Sep 2026 · Natural Resources for Human Health · Vol 6, pp. 1374-1396 · 0 citations · 38 references

TL;DR

Evidence remains insufficient to define a validated premenopausal osteoporosis-specific preoperative protocol, and individualized assessment of systemic skeletal status, local bone characteristics, menopausal status, bone turnover, medication exposure, and conventional implant-related risk factors.

Abstract

To synthesize the available human clinical evidence on dental implant outcomes and preoperative risk assessment in women with osteoporosis or osteopenia, with particular attention to the applicability of the evidence to premenopausal care. The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261509680). PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for primary human clinical studies evaluating osteoporosis, osteopenia, bone mineral density, menopausal status, bone turnover, or anti-osteoporotic treatment in relation to dental implant outcomes. Eligible observational studies were synthesized narratively because of clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed using design-appropriate JBI critical appraisal tools and ROBINS-I when applicable. Eight primary human studies formed the principal clinical evidence base. Implant survival was generally high, but findings were heterogeneous for early or repeated implant failure, marginal bone loss, implant stability, local bone characteristics, and bone turnover. One retrospective study reported associations between osteopenia/osteoporosis and selected first, repeated, and early implant-failure outcomes. Osteoporosis and osteopenia should not be interpreted as uniform predictors of dental implant failure. The available evidence supports individualized assessment of systemic skeletal status, local bone characteristics, menopausal status, bone turnover, medication exposure, and conventional implant-related risk factors. Evidence remains insufficient to define a validated premenopausal osteoporosis-specific preoperative protocol.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access 2026

Relationship between menopause and bone condition for dental implants: an integrative review

ABSTRACT Menopause constitutes a physiological transition marked by significant hormonal fluctuations that substantially affect bone metabolism and may influence the predictability and outcomes of dental interventions, particularly implant therapy. This integrative review aims to critically examine the relationship bet...

Adriana Gledys Zink, Marcel Zink de Pinho, Marcelo Diniz de Pinho et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

BETWEEN OSSEOINTEGRATION AND OSTEONECROSIS: DENTAL IMPLANT DECISION-MAKING IN PATIENTS EXPOSED TO ANTIRESORPTIVE THERAPY

Objective: To examine clinical decision-making regarding dental implant therapy in patients currently receiving or previously exposed to antiresorptive medications, with emphasis on differences between osteoporosis-dose and oncologic-dose therapy, osseointegration, implant survival, medication-related osteonecrosis of...

Glaucia Valias Filgueiras, Nathália Duarte Barros Rocha, Paola Ferreira Galito et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Marginal bone loss in short implants vs long implants with sinus lift in atrophic maxilla, A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the differences in bone loss and implant survival rates between short implants and long implants placed with sinus lift procedures in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in Scopus, Cochrane L...

V. Patil, Bipin Muley, Shrishti Prasad et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Effects of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics on treatment duration and periodontal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PAOO may represent a potential treatment option for selected adult patients, particularly those undergoing anterior decompensation or camouflage treatment with thin buccal bone, but the evidence remains limited and well-designed randomized trials with longer follow-up are needed.

Han-Qiang Xu, Kai-Le Sheng, Yan Wang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.