Nov 2026· IEEE Internet of Things Journal· Vol 13, pp. 48538-48562· 0 citations· 109 references
Abstract
Blockchain technology has emerged as a compelling architecture for electronic health record (EHR) management, offering decentralization, immutability, and cryptographic auditability to address longstanding vulnerabilities in centralized healthcare data systems. Yet these same architectural properties introduce privacy leakage risks that existing surveys have not systematically examined: transparency enables transaction pattern analysis and patient reidentification; immutability conflicts with regulatory erasure obligations; and consensus operations expose institutional identities. This systematic review, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and analyzing 47 peer-reviewed original articles published between 2023 and 2026, develops what is, to the best of our knowledge, one of the first layered taxonomies of privacy leakage risks in blockchain-based healthcare systems, organized across the data, network, consensus, and application layers. The taxonomy maps 15 distinct attack vectors to their architectural origins and available countermeasures. Findings reveal that advanced techniques, including attribute-based encryption (ABE) with policy hiding, post-quantum lattice-based signatures, zero-knowledge proofs, and federated learning (FL) with differential privacy, provide significant but incomplete protection; critical vulnerabilities persist in metadata handling, peer-to-peer communication patterns, and consensus operations. Four concrete research priorities are identified: privacy-aware consensus protocols, standardized reidentification risk metrics, lightweight post-quantum primitives for resource-constrained IoT medical devices, and regulatory-compliant data erasure mechanisms compatible with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
It is found that roles of MVPs in startups were not fully aware by entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs should consider a systematic approach to fully explore the value of MVP, as a multiple facet product (MFP).
Anh Nguyen-Duc, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 93 citations· ⚡9
It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.
Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al.· International Conference on...· 62 citations· ⚡6
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 27, 2026
Prabha Jha used her experience with MIT Open Learning’s program for senior executives to develop AI solutions for her employer, Verizon, and to write a book.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.