Nov 2026· Journal of construction engineering and management· 0 citations· 47 references
TL;DR
The research concludes that the DST provides stakeholders with high-level insights regarding the suitable DT maturity levels—essential for stakeholder buy-in—assists them in making data-driven decisions especially during the front-end planning stage, and helps determine realistic technology objectives that contribute to project success.
Abstract
Digital twin (DT) is a purpose-driven technology, and its suitable maturity level for a specific project depends on the project’s requirements, informed by the adoption drivers that may reflect both project-level needs and organizational strategy. However, to date, no tool or framework exists to assist decision makers in determining the suitable DT maturity level for a project, while a mismatched level of maturity results in the failure of the project to achieve its objectives. To fill this gap, this research aims to develop a decision support tool (DST) to determine the suitable DT maturity level for a project, considering the significance of the drivers for DT adoption as well as the current state of the project. To this end, the drivers for adopting DTs are identified using a novel large language model–based multicriteria decision-making approach. Then, given the limitations of existing maturity model for multifunctional DTs, a novel four-dimensional DT maturity model (including data and technology, business, decision making, and the relationship between the DT and the physical asset) is developed using a design science research approach. The suitable maturity ranges for each driver are then identified across each dimension. Finally, a DST is developed and validated using expert opinion and real-life case studies. The research concludes that the DST provides stakeholders with high-level insights regarding the suitable DT maturity levels—essential for stakeholder buy-in—assists them in making data-driven decisions especially during the front-end planning stage, and helps determine realistic technology objectives that contribute to project success.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 14, 2026
The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.
AI may appear weightless, but every model depends on physical infrastructure. To understand responsible AI, we need to look beyond algorithms and consider the entire lifecycle of the hardware behind them. The post Responsible AI Must Consider Its Afterlife appeared first on GPT-Lab.