Oct 2026· Hepatology Communications· Vol 10· 0 citations· 137 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This review organizes biomarkers by the treatment decision they are expected to support, which covers curative intent and locoregional risk stratification, molecularly guided systemic therapy, immune-state assessment, dynamic monitoring, resistance reassessment, and translational readiness.
Abstract
Primary liver cancers include hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), combined hepatocellular–cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), and rarer hepatic malignancies. Their biomarker landscapes differ substantially. HCC has many approved systemic therapies, yet most are still selected through clinical context, liver function, tumor burden, and treatment line. By contrast, iCCA and broader biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have fewer patients but multiple treatment-directing genomic alterations, including FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, IDH1 mutations, HER2 positivity, BRAF V600E, NTRK or RET fusions, and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) status. cHCC-CCA adds a diagnostic layer because lineage classification and sampling adequacy influence whether HCC-based or BTC-based evidence is more relevant. This review organizes biomarkers by the treatment decision they are expected to support. It covers curative intent and locoregional risk stratification, molecularly guided systemic therapy, immune-state assessment, dynamic monitoring, resistance reassessment, and translational readiness. Across these settings, biomarker value depends on clinical action, evidence maturity, assay feasibility, and timing. The review separates decision-ready markers, trial-enrichment tools, monitoring assays, and mechanistic signatures.
It is argued that clinically useful signatures should be question-specific, stage-aware, and specimen-aware rather than universal multi-analyte panels and the need for prospective validation across clinically diverse populations is argued.
Ke Xu, Yu Liu, Yuan Peng et al.· Biofactors· 0 citations
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a heterogeneous tumor–liver–host disease in which treatment selection depends on tumor burden, liver function, portal hypertension, performance status, and patient preferences. Although hepatic resection and other established treatment modalities remain central to curative and disease-...
Takehiro Okabayashi, Motoyasu Tabuchi, Teppei Tokumaru et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
Recurrence remains a major cause of failure after curative-intent therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including resection, ablation, and liver transplantation. Current surveillance relies on imaging and serum biomarkers, but radiologic relapse may lag behind biological recurrence. This gap has focused attention...
Yang Gu, Xiao-Feng Luo, Yu-Xian Zhang et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, owing to late-stage diagnosis and underlying liver disease that limits curative treatment options. Conventional surveillance and diagnostic strategies relying on imaging and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) lack sufficient sensitivity, par...
M. Amer, Valeria Tosello, Elisa Pinto· International Journal of Bio...· 0 citations
A longitudinal framework integrating baseline blood, imaging and tissue features with on-treatment dynamics, preoperative reassessment and postoperative molecular surveillance is proposed, integrating baseline blood, imaging and tissue features with on-treatment dynamics, preoperative reassessment and postoperative mol...
This review evaluates biomarkers at three clinical decision points: characterization of an indeterminate renal mass; recurrence-risk assessment and adjuvant treatment selection after nephrectomy; and first-line regimen selection in metastatic ccRCC.
Hadi Al Etri, Lea Al Zoghby, M. Zoghbi et al.· Genes· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.