The TrustX Agent Risk Classification Framework is introduced, a structured, repeatable instrument that can be applied to seven types of agentic AI systems and is grounded in foundational pre-existing AI governance frameworks.
Abstract
The proliferation of agentic AI systems across enterprise and public-sector contexts has outpaced the capacity of general-purpose AI risk frameworks to classify and govern them. In this paper, we introduce the TrustX Agent Risk Classification Framework, a structured, repeatable instrument that can be applied to seven types of agentic AI systems and is grounded in foundational pre-existing AI governance frameworks. At the core of the framework is a twelve-dimension scoring rubric that robustly quantifies the risk. This rubric is combined with other components, such as the GPA + IAT classification model and the five-level autonomy framework derived from existing literature. These inputs produce a three-tier governance output with mapped control recommendations. A specialised Coding Assistant extension is also included to account for nuances specific to this type of agentic AI system. We then use an illustrative example to show our framework in practice. ARC is intended for AI governance practitioners, risk officers, developers, and regulators, and it will regularly undergo iteration as we continue to expand it and make it more robust. The community can access the interactive framework here: https://arc.responsible.ai/
Results show that AI-ZTMM complements the CISA ZTMM by providing action-level security controls, and extends CISA’s five-pillar structure to action-level trust evaluation.
Jung-Hyun Mok, Hyun Jo, Sokjoon Lee· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
This work develops a multilevel governance theory for agentic AI and test its mechanisms in three studies over nine model versions, from a three-billion-parameter local model to a commercial frontier system.
The Agentic AI Autonomy Assessment (AAAA) framework is proposed, which defines and measures the degree of autonomy at a task level and provides a foundation for risk assessment, governance, and transparent autonomy policies to support the governed enterprise adoption of agentic AI in supply chains.
Lennart Trumpler, Rodrigo Furlan de Assis, Elias Ribeiro da Silva et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
The rapid maturation of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems, capable of autonomously planning, executing, and adjusting multi-step actions with minimal human intervention, is reshaping how organizations arrive at strategic and operational decisions. Executive surveys indicate that a majority of business leader...
P. Amutha, M. Bhuvaneswari· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
Agentic artificial intelligence represents a significant shift in organisational AI because such systems can interpret goals, plan multi-step workflows, use tools, access data, and execute actions with varying levels of autonomy. This policy paper examines whether organisations are ready to “hand over the keys” to thes...
Vincent English, Marthinus Van den Berg· International Business Resea...· 0 citations
The paper concludes that responsible AI adoption should be treated as a social trust calibration problem rather than a simple technology acceptance problem, and offers practical guidance for leaders, educators and policymakers seeking to scale AI while preserving human judgement, legitimacy and social confidence.
Kwan-Hong Tan· International journal of res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.