Skip to content

Agentic AI Autonomy Assessment: A Decision-Support Framework Towards Governed Supply Chain Systems

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.25405 · 0 citations · 68 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The Agentic AI Autonomy Assessment (AAAA) framework is proposed, which defines and measures the degree of autonomy at a task level and provides a foundation for risk assessment, governance, and transparent autonomy policies to support the governed enterprise adoption of agentic AI in supply chains.

Abstract

Supply chain decision-making is rapidly transforming with the rise of agentic AI - highly autonomous systems that can operate on complex, long-horizon tasks. Yet the adoption of agentic systems outpaces their governance: existing taxonomies of autonomy only offer discrete classifications, rely on subjective judgement, and cannot track autonomy across a system's life cycle, leaving enterprises unable to assess the risks of increasingly autonomous supply chain agents. This paper proposes the Agentic AI Autonomy Assessment (AAAA) framework, which defines and measures the degree of autonomy at a task level. The framework is based on the three dimensions of user delegation, consultation, and collaboration, enabling continuous monitoring from an agent's development through its runtime to end-of-life. The framework's construct validity was tested in a simulated beer distribution game, examining how the autonomy score relates to a company's performance. Results reveal a weak link between autonomy and tier costs with a positional effect: upstream tiers benefit from higher autonomy while downstream tiers are harmed, positioning autonomy as an inherent dimension of agentic systems, orthogonal to capability. The framework provides a foundation for risk assessment, governance, and transparent autonomy policies to support the governed enterprise adoption of agentic AI in supply chains.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Open access Sep 2026

Agentic AI in Supply Chains: Balancing Trust and Autonomy in Disruption Scenarios

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a tool that supports human decisions. It is becoming an active participant in the economy, one that negotiates, transacts, and coordinates autonomously with other AI agents at a speed and scale that no human organisation can match. This shift, from AI as assistant to AI as...

Ana Josefa Matos, Bráulio Alturas, Ahmed Kamel · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Business Decision-Making: A Framework for Human–AI Collaborative Governance and Strategic Value Creation

The rapid maturation of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems, capable of autonomously planning, executing, and adjusting multi-step actions with minimal human intervention, is reshaping how organizations arrive at strategic and operational decisions. Executive surveys indicate that a majority of business leader...

P. Amutha, M. Bhuvaneswari · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Digital Twins and Agentic AI: Applications, Risks, and Governance Frameworks

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed digital twins (DTs) from passive simulation models into systems that can support perception, reasoning, planning, and coordination, as well as action, in some settings. However, the integration of agentic AI with DTs creates governance challenges invol...

Ali A. Alnoman, A. Khwaja, A. Anpalagan et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Responsible Automation in E-business: A Framework for Agentic AI Integration and Governance

This study proposes the Responsible Autonomy Framework (RAF), a layered governance architecture for agentic artificial intelligence (AI) in e-business. The RAF integrates operational efficiency, strategic adaptability, and responsible oversight into a single layered model. Using a conceptual research design grounded in...

Mohammad Talha Siddiqui, Usuf Kamal · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

The CASE Framework: A Multi-Disciplinary Control Architecture for Governing Enterprise Agentic AI

It is argued that agentic AI governance is four problems, not one, each with a mature governing science, and a five-level maturity model with a non-compensatory bottleneck-weighted index and assessment instrument operationalizes CASE as a scientific rather than process maturity model, grounded in production enterprise...

Srinivas Telukunta, Georgios Nektarios Lilis, Lucio Baron · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

AI-GRACE: A Use-Case Operationalization Framework for Agentic AI: From Organizational Objectives and Obligations to Deployment Capabilities and Architecture

Organizations deploying agentic artificial intelligence must determine more than whether a model is trustworthy; they must establish what to validate, control, and observe for a use case to deliver its intended outcome while meeting applicable obligations. This paper proposes AI-GRACE (Agentic Intelligence-Governance,...

John Cuneo, David Chun, Gaurav Khanna · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.