Aug 2026· Gateway Journal for Modern Studies and Research (GJMSR)· 0 citations· 29 references
TL;DR
Overall, AI demonstrated considerable potential to improve pharmaceutical and health sciences education when combined with evidence-based educational practices, comprehensive faculty and student training, and robust ethical and regulatory frameworks.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly influenced pharmaceutical and health sciences education by transforming teaching, assessment, simulation-based learning, and curriculum development. This PRISMA-guided narrative literature review evaluated current educational applications, examined associated ethical challenges, and identified future directions for responsible curricular integration. A structured search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect identified English-language publications from 2020 to 2026. After duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, and full-text eligibility assessment, 32 studies and policy documents met the predefined criteria and were included in a qualitative narrative synthesis. Data were extracted and synthesized thematically. The review showed that AI-driven systems supported adaptive learning, virtual patient simulations, learning analytics, automated assessment, generative AI, and large language models, improving personalized learning, student engagement, educational efficiency, and clinical training. Important challenges involved data privacy, algorithmic bias, academic integrity, transparency, equitable access, AI literacy, and institutional governance. International policy recommendations emphasized ethical implementation and responsible governance in higher education. Overall, AI demonstrated considerable potential to improve pharmaceutical and health sciences education when combined with evidence-based educational practices, comprehensive faculty and student training, and robust ethical and regulatory frameworks. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration and responsible governance remained essential to ensure that AI complemented, rather than replaced, human-centered teaching and learning.
A conceptual model requiring prospective validation is proposed as a conceptual model requiring prospective validation, intended to move beyond ad hoc AI use toward structured, competency-based training that strengthens analytical reasoning, ethical judgment, and equity-oriented practice in AI-enabled public health sys...
H. Arab, Ghazal Assaad Mirdad, Maha Abdallah· Frontiers in Public Health· 0 citations
AI appears most defensible as an augmentative educational partner that strengthens feedback, personalization, and competency-based progression, rather than as an autonomous substitute for educators.
Malek Zarei, M. Mozaffari, Yasamin Hajiani· Currents in Pharmacy Teachin...· 0 citations
Evidence more clearly shows changes in the design and availability of learning activities than durable improvement in learning, and future studies should prioritize active comparators, preregistration, model and prompt reporting, retention and transfer, adverse effects, and equitable implementation.
Jun-Sheng Zhao, Ke-Da Yang, Hainv Gao et al.· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
GenAI should be viewed as a powerful augmentative tool, not a replacement for human educators, and its successful integration will depend on leveraging its strengths to enhance efficiency and scalability while preserving the essential humanistic elements of medical practice through expert oversight and validation.
R. Xie, Bei-En Zhang, Li-Feng Xiao· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
The literature indicates that AI can facilitate personalized learning pathways, augment simulation-based training, and aid in the integration of longitudinal assessment data, particularly in educational contexts characterized by distributed supervision and diverse learner requirements.
C. Wiedermann, Anne Wiedermann, Hendrik Reismann· Journal of Medical Education...· 0 citations
In reproductive medicine education, AI is best understood as a supervised adjunct rather than an autonomous substitute, and the most defensible approach combines phased curricular integration, explicit guardrails, trust calibration, and stronger longitudinal evaluation of learner and workflow outcomes.
Jian-Ye Wang, Zhi-Cheng Jia, Ke-Liang Wu et al.· Journal of Assisted Reproduc...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.