Sep 2026· Frontiers in Public Health· Vol 14· 0 citations· 24 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A conceptual model requiring prospective validation is proposed as a conceptual model requiring prospective validation, intended to move beyond ad hoc AI use toward structured, competency-based training that strengthens analytical reasoning, ethical judgment, and equity-oriented practice in AI-enabled public health systems.
Abstract
Public health practice and education are being profoundly transformed by artificial intelligence (AI), yet formal AI literacy training in academic programs remains lacking. This narrative review synthesizes literature identified through a structured search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for publications issued between January 2020 and June 2026. The narrative synthesis draws on 21 publications, including empirical studies, reviews, perspectives, educational frameworks, and authoritative guidance documents. The review underscores a significant gap between the widespread use of informal AI and the limited availability of formal curricula, with most evidence drawn from medical education rather than public health-specific settings. Key applications include adaptive learning platforms, AI-enhanced simulation, and research training support. We propose the Public Health AI–Education Integration Framework comprising nine domains: learner and curriculum needs assessment; AI literacy foundation; AI tool selection and educational alignment; public health dataset and case integration; adaptive learning and simulation delivery; human-in-the-loop supervision; bias, equity, and ethical auditing; assessment and academic integrity; and feedback, monitoring, and curriculum refinement. The framework is proposed as a conceptual model requiring prospective validation, intended to move beyond ad hoc AI use toward structured, competency-based training that strengthens analytical reasoning, ethical judgment, and equity-oriented practice in AI-enabled public health systems.
Overall, AI demonstrated considerable potential to improve pharmaceutical and health sciences education when combined with evidence-based educational practices, comprehensive faculty and student training, and robust ethical and regulatory frameworks.
Asma Salem, Mohamed Elmabruk Alsarrah· Gateway Journal for Modern S...· 0 citations
AI appears most defensible as an augmentative educational partner that strengthens feedback, personalization, and competency-based progression, rather than as an autonomous substitute for educators.
Malek Zarei, M. Mozaffari, Yasamin Hajiani· Currents in Pharmacy Teachin...· 0 citations
This commentary proposes a context-sensitive implementation framework for responsible AI integration in medical student education in Somalia and comparable low-resource settings that prioritizes faculty oversight, academic integrity, patient confidentiality, multilingual verification, local clinical validation, low-ban...
Mohamed Mohamud Ali, Abdullahi Abdirahman Omar· Advances in Medical Educatio...· 0 citations
The literature indicates that AI can facilitate personalized learning pathways, augment simulation-based training, and aid in the integration of longitudinal assessment data, particularly in educational contexts characterized by distributed supervision and diverse learner requirements.
C. Wiedermann, Anne Wiedermann, Hendrik Reismann· Journal of Medical Education...· 0 citations
AI delivers its greatest value when deployed as a collaborative instrument that augments rather than replaces clinical judgment, which depends on sustained investment in digital literacy, explainable systems, clinician involvement in design, and equitable institutional infrastructure.
A. Bociąg, Łukasz Ptach, Rafał Marciniak et al.· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
GenAI should be viewed as a powerful augmentative tool, not a replacement for human educators, and its successful integration will depend on leveraging its strengths to enhance efficiency and scalability while preserving the essential humanistic elements of medical practice through expert oversight and validation.
R. Xie, Bei-En Zhang, Li-Feng Xiao· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.