Skip to content

Projecting Latent RL Actions: Towards Generalizable and Scalable Graph Combinatorial Optimization

May 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2605.19721 · 0 citations · 53 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work introduces Projection agents, a GCO methodology built on the Wolpertinger framework and adapted to a shared GNN-based latent space for observations and actions, and releases LaGCO-RL, a Python library that automates latent action-space construction and supports existing RL-GCO solutions, promoting reproducibility and adaptation to new GCO benchmarks.

Abstract

Graph combinatorial optimization (GCO) has attracted growing interest, as many NP-hard problems naturally admit graph formulations, yet their combinatorial explosion renders exact methods computationally intractable. Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning (RL) combined with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have significantly improved learning-based GCO solvers. However, existing approaches face limitations in both generalization across diverse graph instances and computational scalability as action spaces grow. To address both challenges, we introduce \textit{projection agents}, a GCO methodology built on the Wolpertinger framework and adapted to a shared GNN-based latent space for observations and actions. These agents are trained to solve GCO problems by predicting a desired latent action in a single forward pass, which is subsequently decoded into a valid discrete action in the graph using the latent space. Across diverse benchmarks, our approach achieves up to 6.41$\times$ faster inference and up to 75\% better generalization than existing solutions using a simple nearest-neighbor decoding, while opening the door to strong RL performance in super-linear decision spaces with multiple interdependent variables. Finally, we release \texttt{LaGCO-RL}, a Python library that automates latent action-space construction and supports existing RL-GCO solutions, promoting reproducibility and adaptation to new GCO benchmarks.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.