This work introduces FLINT (Fixed-budget Late INTeraction), an architecture that uses attention-based pooling to represent each query and document with a fixed number of embedding vectors, and demonstrates that FLINT's effectiveness-efficiency benefits extend across encoder architectures.
Abstract
Multi-vector retrieval models such as ColBERT often outperform single-vector models of comparable scale by matching queries and documents at the token level. However, retaining a vector for every token substantially increases storage requirements and slows retrieval compared to single-vector bi-encoders, limiting their scalability. We introduce FLINT (Fixed-budget Late INTeraction), an architecture that uses attention-based pooling to represent each query and document with a fixed number of embedding vectors. Unlike architectures that pool only document representations while retaining token-level queries, FLINT applies pooling symmetrically to both sides, limiting document storage and the number of vector comparisons needed during retrieval. FLINT achieves comparable ranking effectiveness to the closest baselines on BEIR and outperforms them on several benchmarks with longer and more complex queries, including BrowseComp+, CRUMB, and TREC Tip-of-the-Tongue 2025. We demonstrate that FLINT's effectiveness-efficiency benefits extend across encoder architectures, testing it on two separate backbones (BERT and ModernBERT). On long-query corpora, FLINT delivers 1.5-2.8 times faster end-to-end retrieval than ConstBERT, the closest baseline. FLINT also reduces index size by 5.3-9.3 times relative to token-level late-interaction models such as ColBERTv2.
Late-interaction (multi-vector) models represent documents using a set of token-level vectors, providing a middle ground between cross-encoders and dense encoders in terms of quality and cost of embedding. However, compared to the latter, the indices are costly to store and score. Pooling and pruning based compression...
Results show that late-interaction visual retrieval benefits from query-aware allocation rather than query-agnostic pooling alone, and identifies token top-k for interactive retrieval and the naive greedy implementation as a quality upper envelope.
It is demonstrated that models trained using ColSNAP maintain near full-resolution retrieval performance under substantial compression and that ColSNAP transfers effectively across multiple late-interaction backbones, and achieves most of its improvements via a lightweight adaptation stage applied to a pre-trained retr...
T. Roy, Arkadeep Acharya, Vishwajeet Kumar et al.· 1 citation
Dense bi-encoders and late-interaction retrievers are usually treated as alternatives, yet they fail on different queries: one vector captures what a text is about, token-level matching finds its exact entities and phrases. Using both today means two models, two indexes and a score-fusion step. We present UIBK-Embeddin...
Abdelrahman Abdallah, Mohammed Ali, Adam Jatowt· 0 citations
Visual document retrieval (VDR) systems depend on page embeddings computed before deployment, which makes adaptation difficult when encoder parameters or corpus re-encoding are unavailable. Rerankers provide useful relevance signals, but conventional reranking applies them only to selected queries and candidate pages....
Ze-Liang Li, Xiao-Fen Xing, K. Guo et al.· 0 citations
Visual document retrieval relies on rich multi-vector representations to capture fine-grained evidence in document pages, but encoding and matching these representations can be computationally expensive. Existing compression and elastic representation methods expose smaller configurations, yet making multiple budgets a...
Hao-Wen Xiang, Yibo Yan, Xin Zou et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.