Results show that late-interaction visual retrieval benefits from query-aware allocation rather than query-agnostic pooling alone, and identifies token top-k for interactive retrieval and the naive greedy implementation as a quality upper envelope.
Abstract
Late-interaction visual document retrievers preserve fine-grained page evidence by storing many token embeddings per page, but the resulting storage and query-time interaction costs make large-scale deployment expensive. Pooling document tokens before indexing offers a natural remedy, yet static pooling must decide which visual evidence to preserve before the query is known. We study an alternative: a heavily compressed hot-path index generates candidates, after which query-aware token budgeting operates on the original token sets of the shortlisted pages. We formulate this stage-two selection as a budgeted MaxSim coverage problem, show that a clipped version is monotone submodular, and compare coverage-only, cluster-guided, token-wise, and marginal-gain policies. On ten ViDoRe tasks with ColModernVBERT, direct static pooling reduces macro normalized discounted cumulative gain at rank five from 0.6309 without compression to 0.4738 at a thirty-two-fold pool factor. Under the same candidate-generation regime and a pool-factor-eight-equivalent reranking budget, token top-k recovers 93.93 percent of the full-token score, while greedy marginal-gain selection recovers 98.39 percent. Held-out and leave-one-dataset-out evaluations yield positive greedy improvements over token top-k on every dataset. The latency analysis reveals two useful operating points: token top-k for interactive retrieval and the naive greedy implementation as a quality upper envelope. Together, these results show that late-interaction visual retrieval benefits from query-aware allocation rather than query-agnostic pooling alone.
ViSAR (Visual Semantic Activation Retrieval), a training-free adaptive-$k$ retrieval method for late-interaction visual document retrieval, is introduced and it is shown that the similarity matrix structure correlates with answer accuracy, suggesting future directions for retrieval quality-aware document understanding.
Adrien Mialland, Marc Plantevit, Julien Gallois et al.· 2 citations
This work revisits RAG compression from a data-mining perspective by aggregating historical query--document--model interactions into reusable evidence views and proposes Reusable Evidence View Aggregation (REVA), a framework that mines the target generator's historical attention traces into a document-keyed, budget-agn...
T. Nguyen, Qi-Ran Hu, Ban-Ruo Liu et al.· 0 citations
Visual document retrieval (VDR) systems depend on page embeddings computed before deployment, which makes adaptation difficult when encoder parameters or corpus re-encoding are unavailable. Rerankers provide useful relevance signals, but conventional reranking applies them only to selected queries and candidate pages....
Ze-Liang Li, Xiao-Fen Xing, K. Guo et al.· 0 citations
Semantic Compression Trees is introduced, a hierarchical index in which each node stores only its semantic residual -- the information it adds beyond its parent -- and retrieval proceeds by progressive descent from the root, so that per-query cost is governed by tree depth rather than collection size.
This work proposes Trident, with two complementary components: Trident-R, a retriever-agnostic LLM reranker that converts each candidate into an LLM-readable semantic record, then performs a single adaptive-K rerank call; and Trident-S, a generation-side module that prompts the VLM under topical, entity, and structural...
Guanchen Wu, Jia-Yuan Ding, Subhabrata Mukherjee et al.· 0 citations
QCPruner fuses two cross-modal cues into utility and applies it to both visual targets and candidate representatives within visual-affinity-based coverage, which achieves the highest average relative performance among evaluated complete-system pruning methods at every reported token budget.
Sheng-Li He, Yong-Chao Liang, Rou-Meng He et al.· 1 citation· ⚡1