A Preliminary Search for Evidence on Government Software Engineering Practices: Results from Three Rapid Reviews
TL;DR
These findings are consistent with practitioners' perceptions that academic evidence on government SE practices has low visibility in mainstream SE venues and discuss implications including the need for dedicated publication venues, incentives for government academia collaboration, and improved methods for evaluating grey literature.
Abstract
Government agencies are major software developers and drivers of digital transformation, yet empirical evidence on their software engineering (SE) practices remains largely unexplored. This paper reports three rapid reviews of 2024 peer reviewed publications to assess the availability of evidence on government SE practices. We examined a subset of top tier international SE venues, regional South American SE conferences, and a curated newsletter on public sector digitalization. Across 984 screened papers, we identified only four studies reporting on SE practices conducted by, for, or in collaboration with government bodies, most published in regional venues as experience reports or case studies. Our findings are consistent with practitioners'perceptions that academic evidence on government SE practices has low visibility in mainstream SE venues. We discuss implications including the need for dedicated publication venues, incentives for government academia collaboration, and improved methods for evaluating grey literature, currently a key information source for government agencies. This work provides a preliminary study for understanding the evidence landscape and identifies directions for future research to better support evidence based software engineering in the public sector.