Skip to content
Review Open access

Supporting FAIR Practices In Scholarly Publishing with the Editorial Reference Handbook

Jul 2026 · Scientific Data · 0 citations

Abstract

The Editorial Reference Handbook assists scholarly publishers in supporting the sharing of digital research objects and in operationalising FAIR research practices by addressing gaps in editorial workflows, policy implementation and stakeholder alignment. Comprising a checklist, detailed guidance, and a flowchart, the Handbook provides a flexible framework for in-house editorial staff while also providing value to reviewers, authors, and service providers. The project was developed through a co-creation process involving 14 journals and 9 publishers, and was subsequently piloted by 6 journals across 190 manuscripts. In total, 35 participants representing 19 journals and 11 publishers contributed to the various stages of the project. Evaluation through surveys and performance metrics showed that the Handbook can help in-house editorial staff ensure that data underpinning publications is shared more FAIRly without significantly impacting turnaround times or author correspondence. This article reports on the contributions of the participants, describes the rationale and development of the Handbook, and presents the outcomes of the pilot, offering a reusable framework adaptable across diverse publishing contexts.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

A structured guide to research methods: integrating frameworks, tools, and applications for researchers

This comprehensive guide addresses a gap in methodological literature by synthesizing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research approaches within a structured framework. It bridges theoretical foundations, practical applications, and tool selection—a resource often lacking in traditional texts. The article presen...

Luiz Fernando Fogaça Vieira, Gilberto Pérez, Silvio Popadiuk · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

What Reviewers Mean by “Writing Quality”: An Analysis of Published Peer Review Reports in BMJ Open

Examination of published peer review reports from the British Medical Journal Open suggests that OPR reports offer a valuable resource for ERPP and EAP pedagogy by making visible the linguistic, rhetorical and epistemic expectations that shape publication-oriented academic writing.

C. Fiammenghi · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

From Relevant to Publishable in TESOL Research: Contribution, Access, and Accountability

Many manuscripts sent to TQ are recognizably TESOL, carefully written, and ethically serious. The harder editorial question is what moves a manuscript from relevant to publishable. In this editorial, we argue that publishability rests on three connected expectations. The article needs to make a contribution that chan...

Jim McKinley, Si-Han Zhou · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Understanding service quality in professional services: a systematic scoping review across multiple disciplines

Service quality remains fragmented across professional domains, creating challenges for theory and practice, particularly in underexplored areas. This review aims to map the existing literature, synthesise the current understanding, and propose strategic directions for future research. This study conducted a...

Uyanwaththe Gedara Geethika Nilanthi Kumari Jayarathna, Deborah Levy, Abdul-Rasheed Amidu · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A Practical Guide for Writing and Publishing in the Field of Rehabilitation Psychology

A practical, field-specific guide to support authors in developing, writing, and submitting their work, integrating best practices from multiple sources including reporting standards and open science principles while tailoring advice to the unique values of rehabilitation psychology.

Paul B. Perrin · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.