Aug 2026· TESOL Quarterly (Print)· Vol 60, pp. 1021-1032· 0 citations· 15 references
Abstract
Many manuscripts sent to TQ are recognizably TESOL, carefully written, and ethically serious. The harder editorial question is what moves a manuscript from relevant to publishable. In this editorial, we argue that publishability rests on three connected expectations. The article needs to make a contribution that changes how TESOL researchers, teachers, teacher educators, or policymakers understand a problem. It needs to make knowledge accessible beyond a narrow group of specialists, including through clearer writing and the continued use of OASIS summaries for accepted articles. It also needs to make its claims accountable, through responsible data practices, transparent methods, careful use of AI, and authorial ownership of the argument. These expectations have consequences for authors deciding where to send their work, for reviewers deciding what deserves space in the journal, and for us as editors of a journal that helps shape what the field recognizes as valuable TESOL research.
The ongoing transformation of scholarly publishing has created new challenges for authors, reviewers, and editors in deciding which journals to engage with. As Editors in Chief of AGU Publications, we meet annually to reflect on the evolving editorial landscape, consider opportunities for improvement, and reach consens...
I. Santos, M. Xenopoulos, L. Beal et al.· Geophysical Research Letters· 0 citations
Publishing in medical journals remains central to the advancement of clinical science, professional development, and the translation of evidence into practice. Success, however, depends on much more than having interesting data. Editors and peer reviewers routinely reject manuscripts because the research question is un...
Joseph Varon, Adylle Varon· Journal of Independent Medic...· 0 citations
This paper clearly outlines flexible guidelines for writing a manuscript for publication. While the importance of research quality is undeniable, the presentation of a report often plays a significant role in how it is perceived. Poorly presented research may be unfairly judged because the way research is communicated...
P. F. Ayodele, Michael Olatunbosun Adewunmi· African Research Reports· 0 citations
This study surveys 110 editors from first- and second-quartile journals indexed in Clarivate’s Journal Citation Reports to examine how they evaluate and respond to calls to de-westernize and diversify communication and media scholarship through the inclusion of Global South perspectives and scholars. The findings show...
Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques, Sujatha Sosale, Brian Ekdale et al.· International Journal of Com...· 0 citations
Proposals make arguments about what matters, emphasize community representation, and consider futures worth investing in. “How-to” guides don’t normally emphasize these things well. When it comes to grant writing, reading between the lines to make strategic choices is critical. The writing requires more than learning h...
David Ornelas, Rich Rice, Ronald B. Cole et al.· 0 citations
This article addresses how purposeful research can be sustained in academic systems where what matters is increasingly defined through citation counts and journal rankings. It proposes the recovery of purpose through concern. A study's concern is the normative orientation of its contribution. The article shows how...
Thomas Ahrens, J. Pfister· Accounting, Auditing & A...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.