ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENADAHAN BARANG MILIK PERSEROAN TERBATAS XL AXIATA DI MAKASSAR

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pembuktian unsur-unsur tindak pidana penadahan dan pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam memutus perkara tindak pidana penadahan barang milik Perseroan Terbatas (PT) XL Axiata pada Putusan Nomor 1517/Pid.B/2024/PN Mks. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan jenis dan sumber data primer dan sekunder. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan aparat penegak hukum serta studi kepustakaan, meliputi putusan pengadilan maupun peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan yang akan diteliti. Analisis data menunjukkan bahwa terdakwa melakukan perbuatan membeli, menawarkan dan menjual barang milik Perseroan Terbatas (PT) XL Axiata yang di mana barang tersebut merupakan barang hasil kejahatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa  seluruh unsur tindak pidana penadahan sebagaimana yang didakwakan telah terbukti, baik dari unsur barangsiapa, unsur perbuatan membeli dan menjual kembali, unsur diketahui atau patut diduga, serta unsur barang tersebut dari hasil kejahatan. Pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan meliputi tiga aspek, yaitu filosofis, di mana Hakim menilai dari alat bukti yaitu keterangan saksi dan keterangan terdakwa, serta mempertimbangkan hal yang meringankan dan memberatkan terdakwa. Secara yuridis, Hakim mempertimbangkan perbuatan terdakwa yang sesuai dengan unsur yang ada dalam Pasal 480 KUHP. Sementara itu, secara sosiologis, Hakim mempertimbangkan dampak perbuatan terdakwa terhadap pihak yang dirugikan sehingga pidana yang dijatuhkan bersifat proporsional dan adil. This study aims to analyze the evidence of the elements of the crime of receiving goods and the judge's legal considerations in deciding the case of the crime of receiving goods belonging to the Limited Liability Company (PT) XL Axiata in Decision Number 1517 / Pid.B / 2024 / PN Mks. This study uses a qualitative research method with primary and secondary data types and sources. Data were obtained through interviews with law enforcement officials and literature studies, including court decisions and laws and regulations related to the problem to be studied. Data analysis shows that the defendant committed the act of buying, offering and selling goods belonging to the Limited Liability Company (PT) XL Axiata where the goods are the proceeds of crime. The results of the study indicate that all elements of the crime of receiving goods as charged have been proven, both from the element of whoever, the element of the act of buying and reselling, the element of known or reasonably suspected, and the element of the goods from the proceeds of crime. The judge's considerations in passing the decision include three aspects, namely philosophical, where the Judge assesses the evidence, namely witness statements and the defendant's statement, and considering mitigating and aggravating factors for the defendant. From a legal perspective, the judge considers the defendant's actions in accordance with the elements stipulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code. Meanwhile, from a sociological perspective, the judge considers the impact of the defendant's actions on the injured party to ensure that the sentence imposed is proportionate and fair.