Built around four social studies-specific dimensions—content, source scrutiny, empathic imagination, and ethical action—the Social Studies Discourse Instrument gives teachers a fresh, nonevaluative lens on classroom discussion.
Feedback from more than 100 high school students reveals what makes classroom discussions work—from crafting open-ended questions to balancing teacher participation.
This interview is part of a special issue on reimagining education for learners at the intersections of disability and language, with a focus on speculative approaches for equity and inclusion. In this conversation with Alfredo J. Artiles, Nicole Mirra discusses speculative approaches and methods.
<jats:p/>
respond to young people’s accounts of harmful sexual behavior. Their analysis shows that active listening is not synonymous with agreement or passive empathy; instead, interviewers can encourage participants to elaborate their accounts while avoiding responses that affirm attempts to
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.
