3D-DefectBench is introduced, a benchmark and framework for systematic analysis of VLM-based 3D defect detection pipelines, and finds that automated judges should be evaluated as complete pipelines and calibrated across human reference regimes, rather than benchmarked only as standalone models.
Abstract
Automated evaluation is essential for scaling generative 3D systems, where exhaustive human review is costly and slow. However, the reliability of an automated judge depends on the entire evaluation pipeline, not only the underlying vision-language model (VLM), but also how assets are rendered, what visual evidence is provided, how the task is specified, and how human reference labels are constructed. We introduce 3D-DefectBench, a benchmark and framework for systematic analysis of VLM-based 3D defect detection pipelines. It complements holistic ratings and pairwise preferences with nine fine-grained binary defects spanning geometry, texture, and prompt adherence, providing actionable diagnostics for generator development and judge evaluation. Using a balanced factorial design, we vary four pipeline factors, VLM, camera protocol, visual input, and prompt schema, across 84 inference designs and approximately 3.2 million scored defect decisions, followed by staged validation on a broader set of frontier models. Model choice is the largest determinant of agreement with human labels, but the remaining factors also affect performance, interact with model selection, and can change the best configuration. Within the evaluated design space, a compact six-view RGB protocol performs comparably to denser multi-view settings and inputs augmented with depth or surface normals, making it a strong cost-effective default. Under this standardized pipeline, the best of 12 VLM judges still lag behind trained human labelers, while texture agreement drops sharply when expert-consensus labels are replaced by noisier silver labels. These findings show that automated judges should be evaluated as complete pipelines and calibrated across human reference regimes, rather than benchmarked only as standalone models. We release labels, prompts, predictions, and Croissant metadata on Hugging Face.
Current 3D generative models mostly produce a final surface: a visually strong but largely opaque mesh. Interactive 3D worlds need more than a surface. They need named parts, an assembly hierarchy, measurable constraints, local edit handles, and joints for articulation. We present Nova3D, a system that generates 3D assets as executable Blender source code; the compiled mesh, a binary glTF (GLB), is treated as the artifact, not the asset. Because the output is a program, semantic handles exist at generation time rather than being recovered afterward by segmentation or rigging. We evaluate on Nova3D-Bench, a frozen, spec-grounded benchmark of 54 items across six domains and three difficulty levels with text and image inputs, against eleven baselines in four families (mesh-native, part-structured, code-native, and CAD) plus a same-LLM ablation. Nova3D produces an executable program and a valid artifact for 54/54 items. Every asset exposes named parts organized in a parent-child assembly tree; no mesh-native, CAD, or segmentation baseline exposes either. It satisfies 51/52 prompt-stated numeric and count constraints (best baseline: 11/52), passes 14/18 blinded local edits with locality preserved in 18/18, and articulates 59 joints across 12 assets at 98.3% geometric validity, where every baseline exposes zero native joints. Its geometry is competitive: it wins the structured domains in a pairwise shape-quality tournament and is second only to the strongest mesh-native model, while conceding texture realism to baked-PBR systems. The central result is representational: code-native generation turns a generated 3D object from an opaque surface into a programmable asset that downstream systems can inspect, measure, edit, and animate.
Nimra Noor, Muhammad Bilal, A. Hussain et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
SABRE is established as a reusable framework for constructing and refreshing VLM stress tests rather than a single fixed benchmark, and the results establish SABRE as a reusable framework for constructing and refreshing VLM stress tests rather than a single fixed benchmark.
Zi-Xuan Lan, Luzhe Sun, Matthew R. Walter et al.· 0 citations
OmniMech is introduced, the first million-scale benchmark for evaluating VLMs on executable CAD generation from industrial manufacturing data, and experiments show that current VLMs and CAD-specialized models still struggle with executable program synthesis, fine-grained 3D reconstruction, and reliable enforcement of dimensions and tolerances.
Taiting Lu, Runze Liu, Ziwei Dong et al.· 0 citations
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have become essential for advancing the integration of visual and linguistic information. While existing benchmarks have laid a solid foundation for evaluation, they are often static, resource-intensive to build, and limited in adaptability. In comparison, automatic evaluation has shown promise in the textual domain, but the visual modality remains far less explored. To advance this frontier, in this work, we introduce AutoDavis, a first-of-its-kind automatic and dynamic evaluation protocol that enables on-demand benchmarking of LVLMs across specific capability dimensions. AutoDavis leverages text-to-image models to generate relevant image samples and then utilizes LVLMs to orchestrate visual question-answering (VQA) tasks, completing the evaluation process efficiently and flexibly. To ensure data diversity, our framework employs a hierarchical aspect-driven generation process enhanced with semantic graph-based constraints. To safeguard reliability, the framework incorporates a self-validation mechanism to detect and correct errors, along with an error-driven adjustment module to mitigate potential bias. Through an extensive evaluation of 11 popular LVLMs across five demanded user inputs (i.e., evaluation capabilities), the framework shows effectiveness and reliability, offering a new paradigm for dynamic benchmarking of multimodal intelligence. View website for code and data.
Han Bao, Yue Huang, Yanbo Wang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
Open-vocabulary monocular 3D detectors report strong in-domain performance, but each evaluates under a different protocol, several rely on per-image category oracles unavailable at deployment, and all collapse geometry and semantics into a single AP metric. To address this, we introduce OV3D-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark that compares open-vocabulary monocular 3D detectors under deployment-realistic conditions across seven indoor and outdoor datasets. Our benchmark replaces the per-image class name oracle with test-time dataset-level class name prompts, and decouples detection accuracy along three axes: localization, semantic robustness, and cross-domain transfer. We evaluate seven representative detectors and find that (i) they localize objects well yet often mislabel a correctly localized box as a semantically adjacent category; (ii) accuracy is highly sensitive to prompt phrasing (e.g. WildDet3D's performance collapses from 18.6 to 5.4 AP when prompted with"a detailed high-resolution photo of a car"rather than"car"); and (iii) the widely adopted target-aware protocol hides these errors (e.g. inflating DetAny3D's AP by 1.9 $\times$ on ScanNet). Lastly, we demonstrate that simply remapping a frozen closed-vocabulary detector's predictions using a contrastive vision-language encoder such as SigLIPv2 performs competitively against recent purpose-built open-vocabulary methods. This indicates that geometric localization is more mature, while open-vocabulary semantics remains the primary bottleneck.
M. Gladkova, Neehar Peri, Ishan Khatri et al.· 0 citations
Parametric computer-aided design (CAD) modeling is difficult to evaluate with a single metric. Existing CAD benchmarks often emphasize synthetic or CAD-native settings, limited input modalities, or executability and IoUs alone. We introduce RealCADBench, a benchmark for intent-to-program CAD modeling from real industrial design intents. It contains 12,632 tasks from 19 factory-automation categories and spans text descriptions, 2D engineering drawings, real product pictures, and rendered images for both Part and Assembly modeling. We report results on a 1,770-task evaluation slice: 1,745 Part tasks across four input regimes and RCB-Assm25, a 25-task assembly study used in every reported assembly comparison. Each method generates FreeCAD API Python, which a shared runtime executes to export the 3D model. We evaluate the exported model using executability, Solid IoU, Surface IoU, and a rubric-based visual-semantic identity Judge. Among the nine standalone frontier large models evaluated, no model leads all four metrics. Across six frontier-scale large models, executability ranges from 0.565 to 0.812, Solid IoU from 0.2841 to 0.5379, and Surface IoU from 0.112 to 0.217 across the four Part regimes. The highest regime-balanced composite comes from a different model than the leaders on the four component metrics. On RCB-Assm25, Codex with GPT-5.5 improves executability and both IoU metrics over standalone GPT-5.5, but lowers the Judge score by 6.98 percentage points, leaving GPT-5.5 as the Judge leader. We also observe recurring failure modes, most notably missing fine structures, loss of part identity, and incorrect assembly placement. These results show that execution alone is insufficient to characterize realistic CAD modeling and that frontier models and agents differ substantially across executability, IoUs, and visual-semantic identity.
JoyIndustrial VisCAD Team Linxin Cai, Qiu-He Hong, Zhi-Chao Huang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
