SABRE is established as a reusable framework for constructing and refreshing VLM stress tests rather than a single fixed benchmark, and the results establish SABRE as a reusable framework for constructing and refreshing VLM stress tests rather than a single fixed benchmark.
Abstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) are improving rapidly, but benchmark development lags behind, making weaknesses hard to identify. Building stress tests is costly: samples must satisfy controlled conditions, remain answerable, and challenge current models. We present SABRE, a scalable, automated pipeline that converts a Test Primer (a Markdown Task Design with Data Schema) into structured specifications, generated or edited images, and question-answer pairs. Automated filtering removes candidates solved by a Filtering VLM, while human review verifies candidate validity and supports annotation correction and localized image repair. We instantiate SABRE-Prior to test whether VLMs follow visual evidence instead of relying on world priors -- learned expectations about familiar objects and scenes. Its 600 images and 1,000 questions span Context (unexpected entities in familiar scenes), Texture (counterfactual materials), Attribute (noncanonical component counts), and Language Elicitation (answers suggested by language but unsupported by the image). Across six VLMs, macro-average accuracy ranges from 17.8% to 31.3% (22.6% mean). A real-image Attribute control is comparably difficult for the Filtering VLM. SABRE-Counting and SABRE-Spatial pilots show that the workflow supports other stress-test settings. These results establish SABRE as a reusable framework for constructing and refreshing VLM stress tests rather than a single fixed benchmark.
MissingBench-Verified is presented, a benchmark designed to evaluate a specific and practically relevant scenario: when vision-language models fail to recognize that an essential component of an object has been removed, indicating that this failure mode cannot be addressed through current prompting or post-hoc correcti...
W. Guo, Qi Qian, Shiyu Zhou et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
AutoDavis is introduced, a first-of-its-kind automatic and dynamic evaluation protocol that enables on-demand benchmarking of LVLMs across specific capability dimensions and shows effectiveness and reliability, offering a new paradigm for dynamic benchmarking of multimodal intelligence.
Han Bao, Yue Huang, Yanbo Wang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
This work introduces CRAG-MM-Diagnostics, a diagnostic benchmark with stage-wise data annotations that isolate 1) language-based visual grounding, 2) object identification, and 3) knowledge retrieval and reasoning from the KI-VQA pipeline, and proposes a grounded bimodal RAG pipeline that integrates a visual grounding...
This work introduces a verifiable benchmark of 500 deep research tasks spanning 31 topics and 10 major categories, with three query forms designed to probe complementary capabilities required for deep research.
Can Wang, Hao-Ran Chen, Hao Gao et al.· 0 citations
Vision language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance on visual document understanding benchmarks such as DocVQA, ChartQA, and MMLongBench-Doc. However, real-world documents combine multiple factors such as length, layout complexity, modality, and question difficulty, which makes it difficult to attribute mode...
Abhigya Verma, Khyati Mahajan, Amit Kumar Saha et al.· 0 citations
Test-time scaling (TTS) reliably improves reasoning in large language models, but whether it transfers to small open vision-language models remains unclear. We examine this on EXAMS-V, a multilingual visual multiple-choice benchmark, comparing self-consistency, describe-then-reason with PRM-guided beam search, and two...
Spiros Baxevanakis, Peng-Jian Yang· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.