Guideline-Directed Treatment Eligibility and Burden of Untreated Stage-1 Hypertension Under the 2025 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guideline: Insights From NHANES 2015 to 2020.
Oct 2026· Journal of the American Heart Association : Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease· pp.
e049525
· 0 citations· 29 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The 2025 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guideline recommendations were largely concordant with the prior guideline among adults with untreated stage 1 hypertension, while still newly identifying a subset of individuals with elevated cardiometabolic risk who may benefit from earlier intervention.
Abstract
Background
Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Adoption of the Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events risk model in the 2025 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline may substantially alter the number and characteristics of adults with untreated stage 1 hypertension who are recommended for treatment. We aimed to quantify treatment-recommendation reclassification among adults with untreated stage 1 hypertension under the 2025 Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events-based guideline compared with the 2017 pooled cohort equations-based guideline.
Methods
This cross-sectional, nationally representative study used data from NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 2015 to March 2020. The study population included adults aged 30 to 79 years with stage 1 hypertension, focusing on untreated participants. The exposure was the guideline-endorse cardiovascular risk assessment framework, pooled cohort equations, and Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events, respectively. The primary outcome was recommendation for antihypertensive pharmacotherapy.
Results
Among 1926 adults with stage 1 hypertension (weighted 32.57 million), 59.59% (19.41 million) were untreated. Under the 2025 guideline, 13.84% (95% CI, 7.06%-20.63%) of untreated adults eligible under the Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events threshold (0.42 million) became newly eligible for pharmacotherapy compared with the 2017 guideline. Newly eligible adults were older (mean±SE, 60.48 [0.77] years) and had higher diabetes prevalence (37.74% [95% CI, 15.45%-60.04%]) than those below the treatment threshold.
Conclusions
The 2025 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guideline recommendations were largely concordant with the prior guideline among adults with untreated stage 1 hypertension, while still newly identifying a subset of individuals with elevated cardiometabolic risk who may benefit from earlier intervention.
ABSTRACT Objectives To quantify cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and implications for targeting preventive pharmacotherapy, using the 2023 guideline‐recommended Australian CVD risk algorithm, and compare this to the previous (2012) algorithm. Study Type Application and comparison of two risk prediction algorithms. Se...
N. Lazarevic, M. Bhat, Grace Joshy et al.· Medical Journal of Australia· 0 citations
The 2024 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines retained the diagnostic threshold for hypertension (≥ 140/90 mmHg) but revised the classification of office blood pressure (BP) values below this threshold and introduced a risk-based management strategy. However, there are limited data regarding the impact of th...
Ismail Cifci, E. Koç· BMC Primary Care· 0 citations
This review examines the 2025 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology multisociety hypertension guideline, placing its recommendations in historical context and evaluating the supporting evidence across major clinical populations. The 2025 guideline retains the 2017 blood pressure categories and treat...
J. Giacona, W. Vongpatanasin· Current Cardiology Reports· 0 citations
The authors review the evolution of CAC across the 2007, 2018, and 2026 ACC/AHA guideline documents and discuss the expanding role of CAC in personalized cardiovascular prevention.
K. Irannejad, R. Mora, Srikanth Krishnan et al.· JACC Cardiovascular Imaging· 1 citation
Lowering the diastolic threshold to 70 mmHg produced substantial reclassification but did not identify an independent higher-risk phenotype when systolic BP remained < 120 mmHg, questioning the relevance of such a low diastolic threshold for elevated BP in the new ESC 2024 classification.
M. Lepoittevin, P. Bauvin, A. Benani et al.· Journal of Hypertension· 0 citations
It is suggested that higher blood pressure may amplify the adverse prognostic significance of underweight, as well as the association between body mass index category and 10-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events differed across blood pressure categories.
T. Kawano, Tomohisa Seki, Hiroaki Araie et al.· Hypertension Research· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.