Aug 2026· JACC Cardiovascular Imaging· Vol 19, pp. 1271-1275· 1 citation· 16 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The authors review the evolution of CAC across the 2007, 2018, and 2026 ACC/AHA guideline documents and discuss the expanding role of CAC in personalized cardiovascular prevention.
Abstract
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is an established marker of subclinical atherosclerosis that improves cardiovascular risk stratification beyond traditional risk factors. Since the 2007 ACCF (American College of Cardiology Foundation)/AHA (American Heart Association) Clinical Expert Consensus Statement, the role of CAC in prevention guidelines has progressively evolved. The strength of CAC recommendations has increased from a Class IIb recommendation for selected intermediate-risk adults in 2007 to a Class IIa recommendation for risk refinement in the 2018 ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline and to Class I recommendations for selected CAC-defined populations in the 2026 ACC (American College of Cardiology)/AHA multisociety dyslipidemia guideline. The 2018 guideline incorporated CAC primarily to guide statin allocation when treatment decisions were uncertain. The 2026 guideline further expands CAC-based recommendations by incorporating age- and sex-adjusted percentiles, CAC-guided treatment intensity, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol goals, including management of very high CAC phenotypes. In this brief report, the authors review the evolution of CAC across the 2007, 2018, and 2026 ACC/AHA guideline documents and discuss the expanding role of CAC in personalized cardiovascular prevention.
Reclassification results support selective use of CAC in those with borderline to intermediate risk estimated by the PREVENT-ASCVD equations, and in some groups, did not change model discrimination and reclassification.
Xiao-Ning Huang, Lucia C. Petito, N. Allen et al.· Journal of the American Medi...· 0 citations
Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scoring has become a central tool for detecting subclinical atherosclerosis and refining cardiovascular risk assessment, particularly in individuals with intermediate or atypical risk profiles. Traditional risk models such as the ASCVD Pooled Cohort Equations remain foundational but have i...
Mohammadmoein Dehesh, Reihanehsadat Hosseini· Current Cardiology Reviews· 0 citations
A practical, evidence-based synthesis of Lp(a) biology, contemporary guideline recommendations, integrated risk stratification using PREVENT and CAC, current management, and emerging Lp(a)-targeted therapies for use across primary care and cardiology practice are provided.
A. Syed, Samuel Michalak, I. Potulapati et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
The 2025 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guideline recommendations were largely concordant with the prior guideline among adults with untreated stage 1 hypertension, while still newly identifying a subset of individuals with elevated cardiometabolic risk who may benefit from earli...
Qi Jian, Yi-Shan Chen, M. Ruzieh et al.· Journal of the American Hear...· 0 citations
This review examines the 2025 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology multisociety hypertension guideline, placing its recommendations in historical context and evaluating the supporting evidence across major clinical populations. The 2025 guideline retains the 2017 blood pressure categories and treat...
J. Giacona, W. Vongpatanasin· Current Cardiology Reports· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.