Depletion experiments revealed that booster-induced immunity was predominantly mediated by cross-reactive antibodies, with the highest levels after breakthrough infections and the lowest after a primary WT infection, providing functional insights into the antibody specificities associated with imprinting effects following variant-adapted booster vaccination.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 has evolved into several genetic variants, all bearing mutations that reduce antibody binding and affect vaccine and treatment effectiveness. Updated COVID-19 vaccines, including bivalent formulations (wild type [WT]/BA.1 or WT/BA.5) and more recent monovalent versions targeting emerging variants such as XBB.1.5, JN.1, KP.2 or LP.8.1, were developed to broaden protection. However, immune imprinting may limit the induction of neutralizing antibodies against strains that differ significantly, even after receiving several variant-specific boosters. A deeper understanding of how booster vaccination reshapes antibody specificity remains essential for rational vaccine design. We examined the antibody response to a bivalent WT/BA.5 booster, focusing on antibody levels and neutralization. Serum samples collected before and after a fourth dose of monovalent WT or bivalent (WT/BA.5) mRNA vaccines were compared with sera from individuals after primary WT infections and Omicron BA.1, BA.2, or BA.5 breakthrough infections. We found that both monovalent and bivalent boosters significantly increased IgG and neutralizing antibodies, but breakthrough infections induced broader cross-reactive responses. Depletion experiments revealed that booster-induced immunity was predominantly mediated by cross-reactive antibodies, with the highest levels after breakthrough infections and the lowest after a primary WT infection. These findings provide functional insights into the antibody specificities associated with imprinting effects following variant-adapted booster vaccination.
The observed waning of cross-neutralizing antibodies against emerging variants underscores the challenge of maintaining durable protection and supports the need for continued monitoring of antibody responses to guide evidence-based updates to COVID-19 vaccines.
Wei Wang, E. Goguet, Sabrina Lusvarghi et al.· Open Forum Infectious Diseas...· 0 citations
Data on immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in West and Central Africa remain limited, particularly across SARS-CoV-2 variants and vaccine platforms. Using the InVITE cohort in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea, Liberia, and Mali, we evaluated anti-spike (anti-S) antibody binding to nine SARS-CoV-2 variants in 96 participants equally selected from pre-vaccination assay defined seropositive and seronegative groups. Participants received mRNA, adenovirus-vectored, or inactivated virus vaccines. Anti-S binding was measured before vaccination and two months after completion of the primary series using a Meso Scale Discovery 10-plex assay. Before vaccination, antibody binding was significantly higher against pre-Omicron variants (Ancestral, Alpha, Beta, and Delta) than Omicron variants in both seronegative (fold change [FC] 3.85, 99% CI 3.45–4.17) and seropositive (FC 3.57, 99% CI 3.33–3.84) participants. Seropositive individuals showed greater binding than seronegative individuals across all variants. Two months post-vaccination, mRNA vaccines elicited higher antibody binding than adenovirus-vectored or inactivated vaccines, whereas no significant differences were observed between adenovirus-vectored and inactivated vaccines. Antibody binding remained higher against pre-Omicron than Omicron variants across all vaccine platforms and serostatus groups. These findings provide rare data on variant-specific vaccine-elicited antibody binding responses in West and Central African populations with distinct demographic, epidemiologic, and immunologic background.
Trial registration: Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05096091, Registration date: 10-26-2021, Clinical trial registry:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05096091?term=NCT05096091rank=1#study-overview
.
E. Lusamaki, Ana M. Ortega-Villa, Daouda Camara et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
Lower humoral immune responses with increasing time after heterologous mRNA booster vaccination in individuals primed with CoronaVac and may inform future booster strategies are suggested.
H. Harapan, A. P. Ayulinda, Qatrunnada Kamil et al.· Acta Tropica· 0 citations
Intranasal boosting promotes greater variant-specific response at both the serum and cellular levels than i.m.n. boosting, and ongoing B cell repertoire and mAb analyses will provide mechanistic insight into how vaccination route reshapes clonal selection and maturation, informing rational vaccination design.
Xinyi Liu, Chieh-Yu Liang, Michael S. Diamond· Journal of Immunology· 0 citations
It is proposed that there is somatic hypermutation of existing B cell clones rather than de novo generation from naive B cells in JN.1-adapted booster vaccines and this finding indicates maturation of pre-existing, class-switched MBC rather than substantial de novo recruitment of naïve B cells.
M. Stankov, Matthias Bruhn, M. Hoffmann et al.· Nature Communications· 0 citations
Data indicate the KP.2 mRNA vaccine generates durable, cross-reactive responses against current Omicron subvariants, however, ongoing spike evolution impacts the neutralization of emerging lineages, highlighting the need for continued viral monitoring and timely vaccine updates.
Sanjeev Kumar, Li-Lin Lai, M. Ellis et al.· Journal of Virology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.