Log in
Back to #explainable ai
#explainable ai Book Open access

Analogies and Metaphors for Agentic AI: How Industry Practitioners Explain Emerging AI Systems

Felix Stundzig Vincent Heimburg Manuel Wiesche
Aug 2026 · Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2026 · 0 citations · 30 references

TL;DR

This work conducts semi-structured interviews with industry practitioners working with agentic AI systems, indicating that agentic AI systems are mainly explained through organizational and anthropomorphic source domains, such as employees, teams, or assistants, which embed abstract system qualities within familiar social structures.

Abstract

Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems transition organizational technology from reactive applications to distributed, goal-oriented architectures. While earlier research has focused on their technical capabilities, little is known about how these systems are intellectually framed by those who develop and deploy them. We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with industry practitioners working with agentic AI systems, including developers, consultants, engineers, and founders. Our results indicate that agentic AI systems are mainly explained through organizational and anthropomorphic source domains, such as employees, teams, or assistants, which embed abstract system qualities within familiar social structures. We contribute to HCI research by demonstrating that such conceptualizations serve as pre-structuring mechanisms that influence mental models, expectations, and interactions with agentic AI systems before direct engagement. Based on this, we outline implications for designing explanation strategies in human-AI interaction.

DOI Semantic Scholar
Read PDF

Similar papers

#explainable ai Aug 2026

AI and Bullshit

It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.

Duncan Pritchard · 1 citation
#explainable ai Review Sep 2026

Advancing stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of machine learning-based risk prediction models

In light of the pervasive methodological limitations identified, including high analytic risk of bias, absence of external validation, and lack of model interpretability, claims of ML superiority over CHA2DS2-VASc must be interpreted with caution.

Md. Mohaimenul Islam, Arinzechukwu Nkemdirim Okere · 0 citations
#reinforcement learning Nov 2026

Reinforcement Loads Prediction of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Structures Using Explainable and Nonexplainable Machine Learning Approaches

This study presents three advanced machine learning models: the evolutionary Gaussian process inference model, the artificial satellite search algorithm–moment balance machine (ASSA-MBM), and the Operation Rain Forest (ORF), which are designed to predict the maximum reinforcement load in geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. These models were developed to enhance both predictive accuracy and model interpretability by incorporating state-of-the-art optimization algorithms and explainable machine learning frameworks. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted using 10-fold cross-validation, and the proposed models were benchmarked against previously developed AI models from literature, as well as traditional and semiempirical approaches such as Rankine, Coulomb, and K -stiffness. Among the proposed models, ASSA-MBM consistently achieved the best performance, recording the lowest testing root mean squared error (0.617), the highest correlation coefficient ( R = 0.918 ), and the highest reference index ( RI = 0.951 ). Additionally, the ORF model offers transparency by generating mathematical regression equations, which are crucial in geotechnical engineering.

Min-Yuan Cheng, Akhmad F. K. Khitam, Jia-Wang Liou · 0 citations

Related blog posts