Skip to content
Conference

Trace-Based Governance for Agentic AI: An MCP-Based Framework for Observability, Human Oversight, and Accountability

Heidrun Mühle Andreas Stöckl
Jul 2026 · 2026 6th International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET) · pp. 1-7 · 0 citations · 25 references

Abstract

Agentic AI systems, LLM-based agents that autonomously plan multi-step tasks and execute them via tool calls, are increasingly deployed in organizations, yet systematic instruments to operationalize governance, transparency, and accountability for agentic tool usage remain lacking. This paper presents the conceptual design of a trace-based governance framework that operates without access to internal model reasoning (Chain-of-Thought) and instead leverages observable execution evidence. The core artifact is an MCP (Model Context Protocol) Governance Gateway, a platform-agnostic integration layer positioned between AI host applications and organizational tools. The framework addresses three governance dimensions: (1) transparency as observability through structured evidence capture of tool calls, data provenance, and human approvals; (2) human oversight through risk-based policy mechanisms including approval gating and capability boundaries; and (3) accountability through auditable logs with tamper-evident integrity mechanisms. We formalize governance requirements derived from the EU AI Act and EU HLEG Trustworthy AI guidelines, propose an Agent Action & Evidence Graph as a formal evidence model, and outline a three-stage evaluation strategy. The framework contributes a novel approach to operationalizing regulatory AI governance requirements for heterogeneous agentic tool ecosystems.

View source

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

Making Agent-Mediated Contributions Governable: A Project-Level Governance Manifest for Open-Source AI Collaboration

The study develops a three-layer framework of agent-readability, traceability, and governability, theorizes agent-mediated contributions as governable boundary objects, and advances compliance-enabling digital innovation governance while preserving maintainer decision authority.

Jinjin Gao, Lu-Yang Li, Shu-Fen Guo et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

LATTICE: a governance-first architecture for authorized autonomous AI operations

LATTICE (Layered Agentic Triad Topology for Intelligent Coordinated Execution), a governance-first architecture that reframes the authorization question from “do the authors trust this AI?” to “do they trust this architecture?”

Elias Calboreanu · 2 citations
Open access Sep 2026

From Service Accounts to Agentic Identities: A Zero Trust Governance Framework for Delegated Authority, Runtime Tool Control, and Accountable Non-Human Actors in Enterprise Cybersecurity

Agentic AI is changing enterprise cybersecurity as AI systems move beyond passive content generation toward autonomous planning, tool use, delegated execution, and operational action. As agents connect to email, code repositories, security operations center (SOC) platforms, finance workflows, cloud services, and enterp...

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Enterprise Validation and Governance of Knowledge-Grounded and Agentic AI Systems: Challenges, Solutions, and a Trustworthiness Assurance Framework

It is concluded that validation and governance of grounded and agentic AI must be treated as a first-class enterprise reliability engineering discipline — auditable, thresholddriven, and embedded across the inference lifecycle — rather than as an extension of conventional model evaluation.

Suresh Babu Narra · 0 citations
2026

Governing Agentic AI in Enterprise Operations: Architectural “Rails” for Safe, Deterministic, and Compliant Autonomous Systems

This paper argues that the introduction of agentic AI requires a substantial expansion of traditional enterprise architecture principles to address new behavioral, security, and governance risks emerging from non-deterministic AI systems interacting with heterogeneous operational platforms-ERP, HCM, CLM, asset manageme...

Elizabeth Koumpan, Vimal Dimpi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI Governance Engineering: A Framework for Secure, Explainable, and Trustworthy Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Systems

This paper argues for a transition from AI Governance as Compliance to AI Governance Engineering , a systems-oriented discipline in which governance is embedded throughout the enterprise intelligence lifecycle, enabling enterprise intelligence systems that are secure, explainable, trustworthy, and governable by design.

Faruk Çelikkanat · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.