Jul 2026· 2026 6th International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET)· pp. 1-7· 0 citations· 25 references
Abstract
Agentic AI systems, LLM-based agents that autonomously plan multi-step tasks and execute them via tool calls, are increasingly deployed in organizations, yet systematic instruments to operationalize governance, transparency, and accountability for agentic tool usage remain lacking. This paper presents the conceptual design of a trace-based governance framework that operates without access to internal model reasoning (Chain-of-Thought) and instead leverages observable execution evidence. The core artifact is an MCP (Model Context Protocol) Governance Gateway, a platform-agnostic integration layer positioned between AI host applications and organizational tools. The framework addresses three governance dimensions: (1) transparency as observability through structured evidence capture of tool calls, data provenance, and human approvals; (2) human oversight through risk-based policy mechanisms including approval gating and capability boundaries; and (3) accountability through auditable logs with tamper-evident integrity mechanisms. We formalize governance requirements derived from the EU AI Act and EU HLEG Trustworthy AI guidelines, propose an Agent Action & Evidence Graph as a formal evidence model, and outline a three-stage evaluation strategy. The framework contributes a novel approach to operationalizing regulatory AI governance requirements for heterogeneous agentic tool ecosystems.
The study develops a three-layer framework of agent-readability, traceability, and governability, theorizes agent-mediated contributions as governable boundary objects, and advances compliance-enabling digital innovation governance while preserving maintainer decision authority.
LATTICE (Layered Agentic Triad Topology for Intelligent Coordinated Execution), a governance-first architecture that reframes the authorization question from “do the authors trust this AI?” to “do they trust this architecture?”
Elias Calboreanu· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 2 citations
Agentic AI is changing enterprise cybersecurity as AI systems move beyond passive content generation toward autonomous planning, tool use, delegated execution, and operational action. As agents connect to email, code repositories, security operations center (SOC) platforms, finance workflows, cloud services, and enterp...
It is concluded that validation and governance of grounded and agentic AI must be treated as a first-class enterprise reliability engineering discipline — auditable, thresholddriven, and embedded across the inference lifecycle — rather than as an extension of conventional model evaluation.
Suresh Babu Narra· International Journal of Int...· 0 citations
This paper argues that the introduction of agentic AI requires a substantial expansion of traditional enterprise architecture principles to address new behavioral, security, and governance risks emerging from non-deterministic AI systems interacting with heterogeneous operational platforms-ERP, HCM, CLM, asset manageme...
Elizabeth Koumpan, Vimal Dimpi· AHFE International· 0 citations
This paper argues for a transition from AI Governance as Compliance to AI Governance Engineering , a systems-oriented discipline in which governance is embedded throughout the enterprise intelligence lifecycle, enabling enterprise intelligence systems that are secure, explainable, trustworthy, and governable by design.
Faruk Çelikkanat· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.