Aug 2026· Magna Scientia Advanced Biology and Pharmacy· 0 citations
TL;DR
The study concludes that strengthening fraud detection and financial reporting integrity requires integrating analytics and internal controls within a unified governance framework supported by continuous monitoring, institutional accountability, and transparent oversight mechanisms.
Abstract
This integrative review explores the role of data analytics and internal control systems in preventing fraud and financial reporting integrity in financial systems in the United States. The study adopts an integrative literature review approach that brings together a body of peer-reviewed research, regulatory publications, audit research, and financial technology literature to examine the use of analytics to detect fraud, the role of internal control over financial reporting, continuous monitoring, and emerging financial oversight technologies in an evolving regulatory and governance landscape. The results suggest that data analytics plays a crucial role in improving transaction surveillance, anomaly detection, risk assessment, and continuous auditing, especially when coupled with machine learning and AI monitoring tools. But the effectiveness of these technologies is still impacted by data quality challenges, model risk, implementation differences, explainability concerns and governance constraints. The review also continues to highlight the role of internal controls to ensure accountability, oversight and reliable reporting processes to support the effective utilization of analytical outputs in financial assurance environments. The study concludes that strengthening fraud detection and financial reporting integrity requires integrating analytics and internal controls within a unified governance framework supported by continuous monitoring, institutional accountability, and transparent oversight mechanisms.
It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.
In light of the pervasive methodological limitations identified, including high analytic risk of bias, absence of external validation, and lack of model interpretability, claims of ML superiority over CHA2DS2-VASc must be interpreted with caution.
Md. Mohaimenul Islam, Arinzechukwu Nkemdirim Okere· Int. J. Medical Informatics· 0 citations
This study presents three advanced machine learning models: the evolutionary Gaussian process inference model, the artificial satellite search algorithm–moment balance machine (ASSA-MBM), and the Operation Rain Forest (ORF), which are designed to predict the maximum reinforcement load in geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. These models were developed to enhance both predictive accuracy and model interpretability by incorporating state-of-the-art optimization algorithms and explainable machine learning frameworks. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted using 10-fold cross-validation, and the proposed models were benchmarked against previously developed AI models from literature, as well as traditional and semiempirical approaches such as Rankine, Coulomb, and
K
-stiffness. Among the proposed models, ASSA-MBM consistently achieved the best performance, recording the lowest testing root mean squared error (0.617), the highest correlation coefficient (
R
=
0.918
), and the highest reference index (
RI
=
0.951
). Additionally, the ORF model offers transparency by generating mathematical regression equations, which are crucial in geotechnical engineering.
Min-Yuan Cheng, Akhmad F. K. Khitam, Jia-Wang Liou· Journal of computing in civi...· 0 citations
A new method for surgically removing training examples from a model reveals that as datasets grow, the link between what a model learns and what it produces dissolves.