Skip to content

PreSO: Privileged Representation Isolation for On-Policy Self-Distillation

Yuhang Yang Mingxuan Xia Chao Ye Shuai Zhu Shouqing Yang Haobo Wang Shenzhi Yang Zhengqing Zang Chenglong Wang
Oct 2026
Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning

Abstract

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) uses a self-teacher conditioned on privileged information to turn the sparse outcome signal of reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) into dense token-level supervision. Yet the teacher's advantage may depend on information unavailable to the student at inference, raising a central question: which privileged changes are worth distilling? We use cross-problem recurrence as an empirical cue for potentially reusable guidance. Comparing the representation shifts induced by full solutions and compact hints, we find that hint-induced shifts are more concentrated and directionally consistent across problems, and yield more sustained downstream gains despite revealing less information. Motivated by this association, we propose Privileged Representation Isolation for On-Policy Self-Distillation (PreSO). At the source, PreSO uses compact hints to limit the solution-specific detail entering the privileged shift. At the target, it estimates a leading low-rank subspace from shifts pooled across related problems, projects the privilege-induced correction onto this subspace, and adds it to the student's unprivileged representation to form the representation-level distillation target. The selected subspace serves as an operational proxy for recurring structure, rather than a guaranteed separation of transferable and instance-specific information. On five competition-level mathematics benchmarks, PreSO consistently outperforms strong baselines across Qwen3-1.7B, 4B, and 8B, improving average accuracy over the base model by 6.8, 9.0, and 10.0 points. Beyond peak accuracy, PreSO attains the highest final-checkpoint average at every model scale, with improvements that persist through the end of training.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.