EvoEye is proposed, which identifies the current monitor's errors, generates informative executions accordingly, and updates the monitor through self-evolution to enable effective self-evolution.
Abstract
Runtime monitoring is essential for detecting impending hazards in autonomous driving systems (ADSs). However, existing ADS runtime monitors have fixed detection capabilities: rule-based monitors cover only manually specified hazards, while learning-based monitors depend heavily on their initial training data and may retain substantial prediction errors. We therefore propose EvoEye, which identifies the current monitor's errors, generates informative executions accordingly, and updates the monitor through self-evolution. To enable effective self-evolution, EvoEye combines a capable runtime monitor with targeted scenario acquisition. FusionMonitor learns cross-module temporal interactions for collision prediction, while BlindSpotEvolver converts current prediction errors into search guidance and uses density-aware mutation to acquire informative executions for subsequent monitor updates. We evaluate EvoEye on Baidu Apollo with CARLA in representative highway and urban scenarios. FusionMonitor improves frame-level Recall by up to 37.8 percentage points at a false positive rate of 0.05, with 2.49 ms latency and 2.8-4.2 seconds of median warning time. Under the same budget, BlindSpotEvolver outperforms uniform and violation-oriented sampling by up to 13.2 F1 points on previously missed unsafe contexts.
This research establishes a statistically robust and deployable foundation for next-generation intelligent transportation systems by coupling Bayesian learning theory with edge computing design.
S. M. Hosseini, V. Kiani, Hadi Sadoghi-Yazdi· Computing· 0 citations
Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS), such as Apollo and Autoware, are complex cyber-physical platforms that fuse perception, planning, and control to ensure safe vehicle operation in dynamic environments. Achieving high safety assurance demands rigorous testing across diverse and challenging driving conditions. However, d...
In addition to environmental-based uncertainty conditions, self-adaptive Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) must be able to handle uncertainty posed by external human drivers sharing the operating environment. Existing search-based AV testing approaches have explored objective-oriented, top-down approaches to develop a range of...
Sol Zilberman, Kenneth H. Chan, Betty H. C. Cheng· SEAMS@ICSE· 0 citations
Runtime hazard monitors for autonomous naviga- tion are conventionally built from geometric quantities: predicted clearance, time to collision, and required deceleration. A model-predictive controller that enforces safety through explicit con- straints computes, as a by-product of every control step, a second informati...
Jamilé Chahine, Wenqi Cai, John Abanes et al.· 0 citations
MomADv2, a reliable state-space memory framework for long-horizon end-to-end autonomous driving, introduces a Selective State-Space Planning Memory Query Module, which filters historical planning queries based on temporal continuity and command consistency, and models the evolution of planning intentions through a sele...
Zi-Ying Song, Sheng-Kai Zhang, Lin Liu et al.· 0 citations
A comprehensive Explainable AI (XAI) evaluation framework is introduced, including temporal sensitivity analysis, interaction-aware perturbation studies, spatial influence analysis, and gradient-based feature attribution methods that provide insights into how the model captures temporal motion dependencies, neighboring...
R. Megalingam, Naveen Prasaad Selvarajan, Pritty Vijay· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.