Experiments show that NeSy-Spatial consistently improves reasoning accuracy with more precise tool utilization, and is proposed as a neuro-symbolic framework for self-evolving spatial skills.
Abstract
Large vision-language models have achieved strong performance in multimodal reasoning, but they remain unreliable on fine-grained spatial tasks that demand both precise spatial perception and fine-grained geometric computation beyond end-to-end generation. Tool augmentation offers a natural solution, while existing methods either plan tool calls from scratch without explicit dependency constraints or rely on fixed pipelines that are redundant and generalize poorly across spatial tasks. An effective spatial reasoning agent should instead accumulate reusable experience and adaptively compose it for new problems. To this end, we propose NeSy-Spatial, a neuro-symbolic framework for self-evolving spatial skills. NeSy-Spatial abstracts tool interactions and geometric operations into typed executable atomic instructions and composes them into two complementary skill types: Tool-Use Skills for organizing tool execution and Geometry Skills for structured geometric reasoning. During inference, NeSy-Spatial retrieves and executes relevant skills in a closed-loop process. During evolution, it analyzes buffered successful and failed trajectories to refine skill structures and prune unreliable or inactive entries. Experiments on three spatial reasoning benchmarks show that NeSy-Spatial consistently improves reasoning accuracy with more precise tool utilization.
Vision-language-action (VLA) models can execute short manipulation skills, but remain brittle in long-horizon procedures requiring persistent task state, dependency-aware reasoning, conditional decisions, and reliable grounding. We investigate a neuro-symbolic framework that combines learned VLA control with explicit task graphs and multimodal procedural memory. Task graphs encode action dependencies, valid transitions, and branch conditions, while memory maintains the active step, completed actions, textual context, and task-relevant visual evidence. Together, these structures guide object selection, destination grounding, subgoal dispatch, and verification of expected state transitions. Human demonstrations provide additional spatial and temporal guidance through gaze or saliency cues. To isolate their effect on policy learning, our initial study bypasses cross-view gaze transfer and directly annotates pseudo-gaze in robot-view teleoperation videos. The resulting guidance is used during VLA fine-tuning and inference. We study two long-horizon manipulation domains, workspace clearing and surgical-instrument handling, which require ordered execution, visually grounded decisions, and conditional branching. We evaluate correct-object and destination selection, subtask completion, task progress, step-order consistency, complete-task success, and procedural or execution mistakes. This work positions structured symbolic reasoning and demonstration-derived visual guidance as complementary mechanisms for reliable long-horizon VLA manipulation.
SMA achieves the highest macro average in every base-model block and the best accuracy among the evaluated methods in most of the 20 evaluations, establishing a practical parameter-update-free path for spatial self-evolution across the evaluated frozen model scales and environments.
Haokai Zhang, Yuhang Ding, Yunshu Zhou et al.· 0 citations
IMBENCH is introduced, a benchmark designed to evaluate intuitive manipulation as an integrated capability spanning perception, physical reasoning, action generation, and iterative execution, and position IMBENCH as a step toward evaluating and enabling more integrated, adaptive physical intelligence.
SpatialCLI is proposed, a framework that teaches VLMs to reason with spatial tools and progressively internalize the specialist perceptual capabilities they provide and introduces SpatialCLI-Bench, a 516-example benchmark for compositional perception across localization, segmentation, depth, and pose.
Yang Zhou, Zixuan Huang, Sunzhu Li et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Robots that follow open-ended language instructions need to connect semantic intent to visual scene understanding, geometric feasibility, object states, and physical interaction conditions. End-to-end Vision-Language-Action policies have improved cross-task generalization, but they typically map visual and language inputs directly to robot actions, leaving limited explicit structure for long-horizon decomposition, physical verification, and recovery. We present \method, a zero-shot hierarchical framework functionally inspired by the division of roles in the human brain, comprising visual perception and state inference, language grounding and action-sequence generation from a shared atomic action library, cost-based plan selection, and real-robot execution and verification. The framework grounds commands in explicit object states, composes reusable atomic actions into task-conditioned sequences, ranks alternative sequences by execution cost, and verifies intermediate physical outcomes from refreshed observations. In the evaluation, \method{} completes 10/10 clean board trials, 10/10 pick-and-place trials, and 4/5 pyramid stacking trials for both the flat and irregular initial-layout conditions; the corresponding mean task progress is $99.03\%$, $100.00\%$, and $96.67\%$ respectively. Across all evaluated conditions, \method{} achieves higher success rates than ReKep, Dream2Flow, and $\pi_{0.5}$ benchmarks, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining explicit object-state reasoning, compositional atomic actions, cost-based plan selection, and closed-loop execution verification.
Unknown authors· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
