Skip to content

SpatialCLI: Learning to Reason With Spatial Tools, Then Without Them

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.27703 · 0 citations · 159 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

SpatialCLI is proposed, a framework that teaches VLMs to reason with spatial tools and progressively internalize the specialist perceptual capabilities they provide and introduces SpatialCLI-Bench, a 516-example benchmark for compositional perception across localization, segmentation, depth, and pose.

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in embodied agents to interpret visual inputs, reason about spatial relationships, and make task-level decisions based on that reasoning. However, a fundamental capability mismatch remains: general VLMs can reason about the overall task but often miss the visual details that determine success, while specialist vision models can capture those details but cannot translate them into task-level decisions. In this work, we propose SpatialCLI, a framework that teaches VLMs to reason with spatial tools and progressively internalize the specialist perceptual capabilities they provide. SpatialCLI proceeds in three stages: (1) Call exposes specialist vision models as spatial tools to augment the VLM's perception; (2) Learn uses Cold-Start SFT and agentic RL to improve tool use; and (3) Internalize verbalizes successful tool-use trajectories to internalize specialist perceptual capabilities. We further introduce SpatialCLI-Bench, a 516-example benchmark for compositional perception across localization, segmentation, depth, and pose. On MindCube, SpatialCLI raises Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct from 29.3% to 84.6% with tools, surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol with tools (72.1%), while retaining 73.8% without tools after internalization.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Chain of Spatial Thoughts: Modality-Agnostic Spatial Grounding for Vision Language Models

Space Tokens is introduced, a lightweight, architecture-agnostic framework that equips VLMs with explicit continuous spatial representations without requiring additional inference-time modules, and demonstrates that continuous spatial tokens provide an effective, interpretable, and computationally efficient mechanism for integrating geometric reasoning into large vision-language models.

Hunter Schofield, Mohammed Elmahgiubi, Mohammad Mahdavian et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

SpatioLM: Towards General Physical Spatial Intelligence in Vision-Language Models

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) perform well on commonsense reasoning tasks but struggle with visual spatial reasoning. Most existing solutions introduce extra 3D prior inputs or external spatial encoders, which increase complexity and degrade the underlying VLMs'general-purpose capabilities after spatial fine-tuning. To this end, we propose a parameter-efficient \textit{\textbf{Spatio}-vision \textbf{L}anguage \textbf{M}odels (SpatioLM)}, that enhances spatial intelligence without extra 3D prior inputs or third-party spatial encoders. Concretely, we design a plug-and-play and non-invasive spatio-vision module that elicits the spatial knowledge inherent in VLMs. Furthermore, we innovatively leverage pseudo depth and camera information as supervision to guide the model in learning physically coherent representations. Extensive experiments show that SpatioLM achieves significant improvements in diverse tasks, including spatial perception and understanding while effectively limiting the degradation of general capabilities. Notably, the model achieves an impressive score of 71.6 on the VSI-Bench (the first model to surpass 70). In addition, it attains competitive performance when transferred to embodied manipulation tasks. Code is available at \href{https://github.com/xiaomi-research/spatio-lm}{\faGithub~spatio-lm}.

Jing Wu, Jianhua Wu, Jiayi Guan et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Show, Don't Tell: Evaluating Spatial Cognition in Generative Pixels Rather Than LLM Text

ProVisE (Protocolized Visual Evaluation), a benchmark-agnostic framework that elicits protocol-constrained visual answers from image-generation models and parses them into structured predictions compatible with original metrics, is proposed and revealed, revealing complementary strengths of pixel-space expression and text-based reasoning.

Xu Wang, Kaixiang Yao, Miao Pan et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

VistaVLA: Geometry- and Semantic-Aware 3D Gaussian-Grounded VLA for Robotic Manipulation

This work presents VistaVLA, a novel two-stage framework that constructs a geometry- and semantics-aware 3D cognitive representation from 3D Gaussian primitives and grounds it as compact context tokens for VLA policy learning, and introduces Merge-then-Query (MtQ), a token summarization mechanism.

Mo-Han Liu, Zhihao Gu, Xuanyu Chen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Spatial intelligence in vision-language models: a comprehensive survey

This survey provides a comprehensive and unified overview of recent advances in spatial intelligence for VLMs, summarize core concepts behind spatial reasoning in VLMs, analyze why spatial failures occur, and organize existing solutions into a clear framework spanning prompting-based techniques, model improvements, explicit 2D cues, 3D enrichment, and data-driven strategies.

Disheng Liu, Tuo Liang, Zhe Hu et al. · 7 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Is Visual Prompting All You Need? Studying VLM Spatial Reasoning under Progressive Visual Scaffolds

Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced rapidly in multimodal reasoning, yet recent work shows that their failures often reflect an interaction between visual grounding and downstream reasoning. What remains less clear is how the visual presentation of a task shapes model performance and failure modes when the underlying reasoning problem is unchanged. We study this question in SPaRC, a benchmark for grid-based visual spatial planning, by introducing lightweight input-side scaffolds that preserve the visual modality while making spatial structure more accessible. Across multiple VLMs, these scaffolds improve task accuracy over the original visual setting by up to 34.0 percentage points and further complement GRPO-based training, yielding up to 4.6 additional accuracy points compared with near-zero gains on the original visual input. Analyses on both end-to-end task solving and object detection show that these gains are closely tied to reductions in grounding-related errors, while rule reasoning remains comparatively challenging. We find that visual presentation is a central factor that determines whether VLM benchmarks measure grounded perception, downstream reasoning, or a mixture of both.

Lars Benedikt Kaesberg, Tianyu Yang, F. Wunderlich et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.