Skip to content
Open access

Artificial intimacy and synthetic dialogues: Generation Z’s brand interaction and parasocial relationships with ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4o

Jul 2026 · Connectist Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences · pp. 22-42 · 0 citations · 37 references

TL;DR

The findings indicate that ChatGPT-3.5 was regarded as functional in terms of providing easy access to information and understanding questions yet was perceived as emotionally weak and mechanical, while interactions with ChatGPT-4o were experienced as warmer and more fluent.

Abstract

ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence (AI) system developed by OpenAI, offers users an interactive dialogue experience through its human-like responses. The study examines Generation Z’s interactions with ChatGPT within the framework of parasocial relationship theory, aiming to reveal how these interactions are interpreted at the individual level. Seeking to explore how users make sense of these interactions, the study employs a qualitative research methodology and a repeated cross-sectional design that compares two independent participant groups with similar socio-economic, cultural, and professional characteristics at two different points in time. The study examines how users experienced two successive ChatGPT versions. The first phase of the research was conducted in 2023 with ChatGPT-3.5 users, while the second phase was carried out in 2025 with ChatGPT-4o users. The findings indicate that ChatGPT-3.5 was regarded as functional in terms of providing easy access to information and understanding questions yet was perceived as emotionally weak and mechanical. Interactions with ChatGPT-4o, by contrast, were experienced as warmer and more fluent.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Shifting dynamics in human–machine communication: the interplay of user and chatbot gender across two studies

Investigating how chatbots’ presented gender, together with users’ gender and gender traits, influence users’ perceptions of chatbot credibility and social attraction revealed that users’ gendered self-concept modulates their perceptions of the chatbot.

Weizi Liu, Kun Xu · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Relational intelligence in AI chatbots: Examining the trust–engagement-emotion–social presence model using PLS-SEM and fsQCA

AI-driven chatbots may have emerged as the main architects for developing relationships rather than simply processing transactions. The core challenge is to understand how AI-driven chatbots can help build customer relationships. Therefore, this study investigates how AI-driven chatbot determinants, such as personaliza...

Yang Wang, A. Safeer, Yewang Zhou · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Chatbots and Humanistic Counseling: Are Empathy, Unconditional Positive Regard, and Congruence Present in Both?

Generative AI chatbots (e.g., ChatGPT) are now part of humans’ relational milieu. Most people interact with them, and ChatGPT's most frequent usages are akin to common purposes of humanistic counseling: therapy or companionship, finding purpose, and organizing one's life. Studies are emerging from counselor educators...

Unknown authors · 0 citations
#generative ai Book Open access Aug 2026

The Influence of Trust and Need Satisfaction on Young Adults’ Interactions with AI Chatbots for Emotional Support

While ChatGPT was primarily viewed as an efficient tool in a work context, the quantitative survey reveals a weakly significant correlation between psychological stress and openness toward the social-emotional use of chatbots.

Stefanie Osetrow, H. Klapperich, A. Huldtgren · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Longitudinal Evidence That General-Purpose Chatbots Actively Foster Relational Engagement

Social interaction has become one of the most common uses of LLMs, yet research on emotional bonds with AI has focused largely on how users experience these systems, leaving the systems'role in relationship formation poorly understood. Empirically establishing whether systems actively shape these bonds could blur the b...

Lisa Mühl, Jessica M. Szczuka · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.